Insensitive to the dramas of the world? [sf28]

The complex civilization of the second millennium that you find yourself experiencing subjects you to considerable efforts to be able to restore your inner balance, put to the test by many of the stimuli to which you are continually subjected during the course of your days.

The whole world, through the powerful means of communication that you are gradually conceiving, seems to burst into your life, with arrogance, insistently asking to be examined by you.

Every tragedy that takes place on your planet, from the smallest to the most devastating, knocks, with pounding insistence, not only on your attention but even more on your conscience, propagating the false concept of the "global village” as an ideal destination to be reached at any cost.

Man, by his nature, is not predisposed to be able to truly make the idea of ​​a "global world" his own: the field of individual action is too narrow for this idea to truly give birth to life, in every incarnate being. , this abstraction which also apparently seems so close to what the Masters have been teaching you for so long, namely that you are one with your brothers and that your consciousness will, sooner or later, come to a point where which will merge with the consciences of all the other individuals, giving life to a universal brotherhood that is not only theoretical but real.

  • Readings for the interior: every day a short spiritual reading of the Cerchio Ifior and the Cerchio Firenze 77, up Whatsapp and Telegram.
  • Summary of the philosophical teaching of the Ifior Circle: HOW CONSCIOUSNESS CREATES PERSONAL REALITY, you can order here the book. If you're reading this and want support, write.

The main problem lies in the fact that the events that occur far from your circumscribed radius of intervention cannot really get to involve you: even supposing that what the media bring to your attention is the real exposure of what is happening on your planet, this remains constituted, always and only, by facts which, if we want to be optimistic, they will involve you in a way that is very rarely profitable for you and, in any case, almost always in a subtle and indirect way.

[...] If this were not the case, on the other hand, if what happens in the world really managed to forcefully and decisively make its way into your conscience, you would lose sight of what is your main task, the true purpose of your existence in the " here and now” that you are living, or “understanding yourself” in the safest and most complete way possible.

For this reason, I understand and accept your result seemingly numb in the face of environmental catastrophes with which recklessness and the love of profit at any cost continually hurt and make the natural balance of your wonderful planet disharmonious.

For this reason it doesn't pain me to realize that the death of thousands of your fellow men from a war, a disease, an environmental catastrophe gives rise to only words of circumstance and deprecation in you.

For this reason I'm not surprised if, observing the gruesome images of some heinous crime, they don't completely upset and distort the rhythms of your daily life, but become news that after a few days lose their emotional intensity and are so often accompanied by the thought " thank goodness it didn't happen to me."

Your reactions they don't necessarily mean you're insensitive to the pain that the media bring into the field of observation of your conscience.

Of course, sometimes your selfishness is so strong that the pain of others seems unable to penetrate the walls it raises in the face of everything that does not concern him personally and directly, but - and I say this to your consolation - often your consciousness has to make a choice between stimuli that reach you, and her choice operates on the basis of the parameters imposed on her by the need to understand.

This means that primary attention will be given to those elements that most easily fit into the paths of understanding that have gradually formed in you over time, according to a path that is strictly unique to every being who experiences life.

The one operated by your akasic body is not a choice dictated by selfish interests – this happens within the physical plane by theIo of the embodied individual - and, in reality, it is not even a utilitarian choice of the type "I pay attention to this element more than to the other one because the former is more useful to me for understanding certain elements that are necessary for me to increase my understanding , mine feel".

In fact it is not even a real choice, as the discriminating factor is given by type of vibration that accompanies a certain element: items with similar and complementary vibrations with those already "ordered" in the body of your conscience are inevitably attracted and used by the body of conscience, while those that are still discordant or dissonant have no place - at least for the moment - in the scheme that is forming within the akasic body as its understanding adds new pieces . Ananda

From the cycle Nuances of Feeling 2002-2007

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

5 comments on “Insensitive to the dramas of the world? [sf28]"

  1. I don't know if everyone is aware of it but it is easy to do the math and see that even if one decides to do so, it is humanly impossible to just count up to 8 billion which is the population approximately reached by mankind.

    Even counting at the same speed with which one counts from zero to one hundred, even dedicating 12 hours a day to it, a lifetime would not be enough.

    This demonstrates how much certain quantities, apparently within our reach of understanding, are actually beyond our possibilities.

    If just counting them very quickly is impossible, let alone taking care of every single living individual.
    Not to mention what does not belong to mankind alive today.

    Well, it was just a joke that is dear to me because it is the result of one of my personal motorcycles.

    Perhaps useful in the context of this reasoning.

    Reply
  2. Certainly if we always reacted empathetically to all the tragedies that take place in the world, we would be crushed by suffering.
    In my opinion, what counts is how much we spend on our neighbor when he asks us, if our conscience tells us to do so.

    Reply
  3. If, however, we are usually more spectators than actors when faced with these events, it is not clear why we must continually and daily be targeted.

    Reply
    • There are many elements that can explain what you are asking. For example, the action of karmic debts (both individual and group), or, again, the fact that evidently there is still a need to understand something that is hard to resolve and so on. Furthermore, being more spectators than actors cannot greatly modify our position in the face of dramatic events: just think of how many people have been only spectators of what Hitler did but their being only spectators has certainly not canceled their responsibility …

      Reply
  4. Consciousness is a filter with respect to the stimuli that come from experience as it is with respect to what comes from the higher planes

    Reply

Leave a comment