Let us now try to find a connection with what interests you most, that is [the relationship of archetypes with] yourself, as individuals embodied on the physical plane. It is obvious that what has the most immediate importance for the incarnate man is not the permanent archetype (AP) but the transitory one (AT).
The AP, in fact, has a constant and general influence on all embodied individuals, but it is the TA that is most directly connected and correlated to the individual's Akasic body, and is, therefore, the one to be examined first. as it greatly influences what you are, to the point of being able to consider it the element that most conditions what you are within the physical world in which you find yourself experiencing, and we will try to explain to you how and why this happens. Scifo
It may therefore be useful to examine more organically the relationships that exist between the TAs and the personality of man as a whole, trying to make, first of all, a synthesis from this point of view of what we know up to this point.
I believe that the indispensable starting point is to clarify the concept of TA as far as possible.
The TA, we said, it is formed on the Akasic plane thanks to the alleged understandings common to several individuals who believe (from within the physical plane and not from within their Akasic bodies) to have understood certain things.
In a way it can be said that the ATs are the reservoir of all those fragmentary understandings that the Akasic body has not yet been able to adequately accommodate within itself as feel reached up, as it does not yet perceive them as complete and totally true and that it keeps, pending verification, outside of sé.
At the TA - we said - yesall individuals who have reached more or less the same hypotheses of understanding are connected, albeit with slightly different nuances from each other, nuances that result in the presence, among individuals linked to TA, of individuals at varying evolutionary levels within a limited range of feeling.
The individual, by gaining experience, acquires new elements of understanding to complete or modify those awaiting verification by definitively discarding them or accepting them as complete until the maximum feeling obtainable through the stimuli within that TA is reached. Reached this maximum of attainable understanding that specific TA will be abandoned in favor of a different TA.
For the Akasic body, summing up, the TAs are made up of elements to finish understanding or, perhaps, to be discarded - after verification of experience - as wrong or inadequate to be perfectly connected to what is already certain to "feel" as true.
For the embodied maninstead, they constitute gods role models to refer to in order to conduct one's existence, with the consequence of obtaining two important results:
- have one basis of common behavior with other men, thanks to which to be able to compare, to be able to experience and, consequently, to be able to understand;
- affect the lower bodies (mental, astral, physical) which constitute theIo to give an imprint on how the individual will present himself to action within the physical plane.
It is obvious as a consequence of all this that TAs are closely linked to the concept of moral human and that any ethical-moral element that is part of a group of individuals and, therefore, of a more or less large and complex society can be attributed to them; but of these implications, important for understanding the social developments and the mechanics of the groups, there will probably be occasion to speak later in time.
- Readings for the interior: every day a short spiritual reading of the Cerchio Ifior and the Cerchio Firenze 77, up Whatsapp and Telegram.
- Summary of the philosophical teaching of the Ifior Circle: HOW CONSCIOUSNESS CREATES PERSONAL REALITY, you can order here the book. If you're reading this and want support, write.
[...] We have seen, therefore, that the TA influence the lower bodies of the individual and, therefore, give an imprint to the ego of the man embodied with a process, I would say, similar to that of theimprinting, but I don't want to complicate things too much for you.
The influence of the transitional archetype on bodies
When and how does this influence occur?
It already takes place at the moment in which the individual is on his way to incarnation, insofar as the vibration departing from the Akasic crosses the vibrational band of an AT and remains affected by it, to the point of having its vibrations oriented in such a way that the matter that he will collect on the lower planes to build his mental, astral and physical bodies, will be matter that will allow him to express what the TA proposes as an ideal model of behavior, both of experiencing rightness on the physical plane or less of the model itself.
And by saying “experiment the model”, I mean the whole range of possibilities for experimentation: from follow him stubbornly (typical individual behavior that results in blind faith) al to contest it strenuously (typical individual behavior that results in extreme non-conformism to the rules dictated by the TA).
I think it is interesting, at this point, to observe the vibratory cycle that is created from the point of view of conditioning on the embodied individual:
1) TA strongly conditions the individual who is going to incarnate from the start;
2) the individual collides with life on the physical plane and with contact both with other individuals connected to the same AT and with other individuals who refer to other ATs (typical phenomenon of imbalance of those who pass from attending a group connected to the the same TA - for example the life of the country - to the attendance of a group with different TA - always according to our example the difficult insertion into the life of a large metropolis);
3) the new understanding reached (definitive or to be verified further) causes a displacement of the individual's connections with the TA, directing him towards the highest part of it, or towards the typical vibrations of the more defined hypotheses;
- the more and more defined hypotheses reach the maximum and the Akasic body accepts them and inserts them inside as hypotheses "felt true", which leads to the abandonment of that TA, at the same time as reaching the maximum feeling that was acquired through it .
It seems a very complex and a bit dry thing, far removed from your everyday life, but it is not true at all.
To try to make you understand that this is not the case, let's see how this theory can clarify the development of the psychological problems of the individual, providing a first summary basic theory that can be good both for small everyday problems and for problems that, perhaps, they end up turning into real pathologies. Ombre
Continue in [sf15]
From the cycle Nuances of Feeling 2002-2007
We would like to translate this site into English with a neural translator: you want to make your little contribution?
The article is complex but clear.
Now it is clear to me why ATs can produce trauma, as the individual who is forming is influenced from birth.
“In a certain way it can be said that the ATs are the reservoir of all those fragmentary understandings that the Akasic body has not yet been able to adequately accommodate within itself as feel reached up, as it does not yet perceive them as complete and totally true and that it keeps, pending verification, outside of sé. "
This conception of AT is interesting. To reflect on