Transient archetypes and expression of aggression [A47]

D – In some moments aggression manifests itself because anger has been repressed, but there is not always anger behind aggression, so I wanted to understand a bit about the mechanism of aggression. Because some people are more aggressive than others...

Let's say that in principle aggression is not an emotion, but it is a behavior. So the manifestation of a character trait of the individual, therefore a type of reaction, aggressive or not, of the individual which is put into action when in his genetic chain there are those particular concatenations which highlight that type of aggressive reaction in relating to the outside world. Let's say that aggression actually is one of the "gifts" which the individual possesses.

Do you remember that we spoke of this «plafond» of individual characteristics, used by the character, reactions which are part of the character and which become gifts the moment they are understood? This means that even aggression can sometimes be used rightly, it becomes a gift if used consciously.
Now what is the relationship between aggression and anger? Certainly, as it seems to me that it has already been said, the two terms should not be confused, because they are two very different things.

Aggression it is an expressive way typical of a particular individual which is expressed through certain characteristics and is also modulated through what are the social behaviors adhering to the transient archetypes to which the individual is connected.

Anger instead it arises from a clash of internal vibrations, it is an emotion that gradually arises under the pressure of the need for understanding, and comes to manifest itself externally through this sudden peak, which is its external manifestation as an expression of emotion and which we have defined as anger. So they are two things that can be connected but not necessarily.

  • Readings for the interior: every day a short spiritual reading of the Cerchio Ifior and the Cerchio Firenze 77, up Whatsapp and Telegram.
  • Summary of the philosophical teaching of the Ifior Circle: HOW CONSCIOUSNESS CREATES PERSONAL REALITY, you can order here the book. If you're reading this and want support, write.

Q – And the discussion of aggressiveness linked to transitory archetypes, ie the manifestation that the individual has of this aggressiveness is an archetypal conditioning?

Yes, the way the individual manifests his aggression is many times, almost always, modulated by the transient archetypes to which the individual is connected.

To give an example, the same aggressive reaction can manifest itself differently depending on the social class in which this aggressive reaction is manifested; certainly violent aggression in an educated class would manifest itself in a certain way, in a class of very simple, very humble people it can manifest itself in a different way, perhaps even much more physically violent than in the other case. In the first case, it is easier for aggression to manifest itself even worse, through aggressive reactions of a psychological type. In the other case it is easier for it to manifest itself through aggressive reactions, even of a physical type.

D - If the education you received from an early age prevents you from expressing this thing, when the individual is unaware of being aggressive, until he becomes aware, he becomes one himself psychosomatism, or not, if the matter is unaware and the individual in good faith?

But certainly: if the individual is in good faith in what he does, is convinced of what he does, of what he thinks and that he has understood, there may be an inner sense of guilt but always quite light, transitory, the psychosomatic reactions they mainly concern feelings of guilt and occur when the individual does something knowing he is wrong.

I made the same speech years and years ago when we talked about the judgment after death, do you remember? He who has done some wrong deed without realizing it will certainly by the time he examines himself overcome the feeling of guilt for these wrong deeds quite easily; the one who instead made a mistake knowing he was wrong, even in the smallest actions - remember the example of the individual who had stolen a sandwich - will certainly have more difficulty in overcoming his awareness because he will have behaved in such a way that he did not take into account the understanding achieved and therefore the sense of guilt will be stronger.

2008-2017 Annals

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

1 comment on “Transitional archetypes and expression of aggression [A47]”

Leave a comment