But let's try to do a little bit of order, let's try to start from the beginning. You know, for having read - and, if you don't know, I tell you io tonight - that you are immersed in a Cosmos. What do we mean by Cosmo?
By Cosmo, we mean a space, an environment in which individuals find themselves to have experiences, to improve themselves, to rediscover the true Be: in short, to evolve.
And when I speak of "individual", I am referring to that splitting of the feel - of real feeling, of true feeling - which is, instead, individuality.
I'll explain even better: the individual is only one aspect of individuality; the individual could be compared to personality momentary, which has the individuality in the succession of the various incarnations.
The Cosmos, which understands you and in which you live - and which you perceive, of course, relatively because you are unable to go beyond your physical senses - is, in turn, relative; while being real, true, objectively existing, it is relative.
It is relative because it is only one aspect of reality, as there are others at the same time as your Cosmos; and these Cosmos are not communicating with each other, but the only point of reference - and which holds them together - is only the Absolute ... I feel you in difficulty ... Vito
Q - I wanted to be able to understand the discourse of the Cosmos ... but the Universe - what we, at least, mean by the Universe - is the Cosmos? Since we know that the Universe is infinite, from what we are told by human science, I cannot understand: is the Universe the Cosmos? Are they the same, or ...
By Cosmos we mean, as I said before, a space-environment in which individuals experiment; therefore it is not necessarily identifiable with the Universe that your scientists intend.
It is something slightly different, in that the Cosmos that your scientists mean - which is "finite" and not "infinite", as you said - does not correspond to the Cosmos that we mean, which is finite (because it had a beginning and will have an end: and the end will be in the moment in which there will be reabsorption with God).
The beginning was in the moment in which from God, from the Absolute indeed, to be more precise, it was emanated. Is that clear now? Vito
[…] We talked about emanation, it is true? And one wonders what this emanation really is; but even here the answer, in reality, is quite simple, logical: because if everything is in the eternal present, if everything exists in God, if everything is in Him, it simply means that - to give an inappropriate example, but the the only one who can render the idea - with an act of his will (it is, I repeat, inaccurate and indeed wrong), he has managed to materialize this marvelous Cosmos and many others, who live in him and for him; in the same way as some oriental doctrines teach, for which through a very strong concentration a man, concentrating on an object and thinking about it in its entirety, could be able to materialize it. Vito
With the definition God = Absolute, we have given an attribute to God, the only attribute - we said - that could convey the idea of what He is.
God is something more than the sum of his parts, we have said several times: the fragmentation of the world of becoming (of the physical world in which you are immersed, subjected to space-time laws that give the illusion of movement, therefore of the passage from one state to another) that objectively manifests itself in the individualities that experience in the world of matter since the first incarnation in the mineral kingdom, is only one aspect of the greatness of the Absolute, and the sum of all these components (which are, moreover, very many, even if not infinite) do not constitute God, but God transcends them, he is something more, he goes beyond this sum, because it is the idea that supports them.
If you then think that this is valid not only for the Cosmos to which you belong, but for every Cosmos that has existed and will exist, then you will see for yourself how great is the God we are talking about.
The Cosmos (divine emanation that last time we indicated as will, therefore materialization of a thought of God) exist in a separate form from each other, and for the entire duration of their existence they do not come into contact. The only contact they can have is with God; it is only through God that they come into contact: it is as if God were the dash of union between the Cosmos.
From the Dictionary of the Cerchio Firenze 77
Solar SYSTEM - Many solar systems make up a Universe (probably a galaxy, ed), many Universes the astronomical Cosmos.
Many Cosmos exist in the Absolute. But while, between one solar system and another, between one universe and another there is no clear and impassable boundary - so much so that, theoretically, from this point of view a hypothetical astronaut could reach them all - this is not the case for the Cosmos. .
Each Cosmos is separate from the other from the unmanifested and even if an astronaut managed to get out of his own Cosmos and travel into the unmanifested, he would never meet another.
The communication of the Cosmos can only take place in the Absolute where everything is "communion". (P. 173, For a better world)
Insert not present in the original of the CI text, arranged by the editor.
Those interested can also read this comparison between modern physics and CF77 philosophy.
And this is always because they are linked to space-time laws. Consequently, existing "differently" in space and time cannot meet, in the same way that each of you cannot come into physical contact with your previous incarnations, even knowing that you are closely linked and connected to those incarnations.
Now let's try to add something new: we said that a Cosmos (space-time environment seat of experiences) which is divine emanation, has a beginning and an end, therefore it is not infinite.
This means there must be one cause of its existence, but the cause of its existence, as we now know, can only be in God, as this Cosmos is an emanation of him.
One then wonders if there was a first cause in an absolute sense. This first cause prior to the emanation of the Existent must be independent of everything (to be able to make us understand by you we must say "cause not created"), because if it had been somehow created, one would have to go back until reaching the first and true starting point which could not have had a cause.
This uncreated "first cause" enjoys all the attributes we have given to God, that is, it must be eternal, immutable, one, unlimited, eternally present, absolute; in short: this first cause is identified with God. If it is identified with God, it is part of being and not of becoming, hence it follows that cause and caused are one Reality. Vito
Readings for the interior: every day, a short spiritual reading of the Ifior Circle and of the Florence 77 Circle, on Whatsapp.
(Read only, cannot comment) To subscribe
Aphorisms of the Ifior Circle, on Wednesday on Facebook
Privacy policy of this site to consult before commenting, or subscribing to feeds.
