Question - You have said in the past that actions have relative importance and that the thoughts that move these ideas are much more important. An example: of two slaves one thinks of killing the tyrant and does it, the other thinks it but does not.
Meanwhile, you use a completely wrong starting point because we have said in the past that who creates karma is not the thought but the intention. To stick with the example that you did more than thinking of doing or not doing something and then doing it or not doing it, what matters is the intention for which one has or has not done it.
For the individual, the karma moved by the intention is identical whether the intention is practiced or not. This because? Because it is the intention that is wrong and the action (or non-action) is only a reflection of the misunderstanding implied in the wrong intention.
It should be understood (but since this is a hypothetical case it is impossible) if the intention is not implemented, for example, for fear of retaliation or physical punishment. It is evident that the value of an action not committed on this basis has the same value as having committed it as it would have been carried out if it had not been for purely selfish reasons.
Therefore, whether or not the intention results in action is of no importance to the individual who accumulates karma, because the intention is enough to move the karma.
On the other hand, this concept is also easily found in the various religions. Take the ten commandments: one of them is "do not desire the stuff of others", it is not "do not seize the stuff of others" and it seems clear to me that whoever conceived that law thought of trying to stop with words a intention, not action. This means that he was aware of the fact that action is not enough to move the reflection of the "eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth" of Jewish memory.
The discourse could be different when we consider the fact that, beyond what is the intention for which the individual carries out an action or not, there are also reflections on other people and that the action, for karmic purposes , it is not important for the individual who does it or does not, but it can be for those who receive or do not receive the action. This aspect will, however, move a karma towards the individuals who receive the effects of the action.
The action itself is nothing more than a tool, devoid of positive or negative connotation, through which, in the physical world, karmic debts are set in motion by establishing the bonds and incarnational relationships, reaching the incarnation of entities in the same environment. physical and temporal to give them the opportunity not only to pay off the karmic debts they have between them, but also to create positive ones with the help they can give each other to arrive at understanding. Scifo
Let us remember that the intention comes from the individual's Akasic body, that is, from the consciousness that has gradually been constituted over the course of the various incarnations.
But how does this process happen?
Acquisitions, understandings drawn from experiences are transcribed in the Akasic body and from it the impulses return to the physical body that direct towards new experiences suitable for better understanding the nuances of what has already been partially learned.
Since these details, these nuances are not fully learned, errors, bad evaluations, omissions are made in the course of existence, and small fragments of understanding resulting from these experiences are transcribed, again, in the Akasic body, increasing its structuring with the increase of the greater understanding gained.
Apparently it seems a purely mechanistic cycle whose movement feeds itself without the need for the individual to intervene, without the need for him to intervene.
In many cases it happens precisely in this way: the individual, without even realizing it, goes through his millennia of experience and completes his evolution which grows, slowly but surely, without him, on a conscious level, even being able to realize it.
There is, however, a way in which the individual can help this flow of energy between his physical body and his akasic body and it is create preferential ways within yourself so that the energies can pass more fluidly, cleaner, and the intentions that come from its innermost part are thus able to find the Akasic body always better structured and, therefore, to arrive on the physical plane in an ever more evolved way. This medium is the famous "know yourself”Which, for millennia, has been proposed to humanity.
In fact, the individual who is able to observe himself and understand his motivations, his drives, his whys at an astral and mental level, creates in these bodies preferential ways for the vibrations that come from his Akasic body which, thus, they manage more easily both to arrive on the physical plane and to return with their new baggage of experience to the Akasic plane. This causes a faster flow of understanding, of the acquisition of experience and, therefore, of evolution as well.
This obviously entails greater serenity for the individual, as greater understanding means less suffering, less pain, and it is for this reason, children, that we ask you so often to observe yourselves and to try to understand yourselves, as this is the best tool you have to help yourself on the path towards the discovery of your inner reality. Rodolfo
Q - Does the non-understanding of one karma move more karma?
We have seen that karma is moved by what is called the intention, which comes from the Akasic body and which is moved by the need to learn, to get to broaden one's consciousness.
So, when the karmic effect is projected on the individual who has to undergo it, what happens? If I have not misunderstood, this is the point you wanted to understand better: what are the reflections, how is it that this moment unfolds, there is an additional karma, something special that happens in this situation, to the embodied individuality. ?
The one in which karma occurs is certainly an important moment because it is an opportunity to understand something that was not previously understood. If understanding is found, that karma melts away and never comes back to the individual. But, sometimes, the individual fails to draw understanding from the lived karmic situation; in that moment it's not that more karma is created, there is only the prolongation of the karmic effect (always going back to the same misunderstanding) that maybe it can be carried out in a different way and, in some cases, makes the karmic experience very long that seems to never end.
If then the individual just fails to reach the necessary understanding, the karma is as if he falls asleep, always present but inactive, and the karmic experience is brought with sé in the course of subsequent existences, ready to become active again when there is again the right situation to stimulate the understanding of the individual. Billy
Q - I have read that i Lords of karma they are Masters who, with great discernment, work on the choice of karma. But it seemed to me a somewhat restrictive definition.
The Lords of karma - as you said, after having learned the definition almost by heart - are entities of very high evolution who are responsible for following and directing all the evolution of reality within, for example, your planet.
With that you don't have to think, however, that these entities are the ones who create the individual karma of each of you, the little karma that each of you goes through, the little experiences from which you derive understanding!
What is the task of these entities?
Is that of to direct the whole race towards experiences, is to create the social and environmental conditions in which the breed will have to experience its knowledge. They are, therefore, a sort of puppeteers who prepare the basic stages that the incarnated race will go through, establishing when it is necessary that there are particular turning points so that the general conditions change with the change of the different need for experience on the part of the majority of the embodied entities.
They are, therefore, Guides for the collective karmas of the entire race. Certainly they should not be imagined as entities that follow individualities one by one, arranging for them the small (or large) individual karmas that they have to go through. Weather
Q - How do you act on environmental conditions if you don't act on people?
Do you think that the advent of a Christ has not changed the environmental and social conditions? Weather
D - Yes, but then it is a work on the person!
I said they cause the change, I didn't say how they cause it. Certainly in order to act on the collectivity of the race it is necessary that great changes take place and it is for this reason that there are entities that are sent to incarnate in places where their presence is known to have effects on a general level.
On the other hand, throughout the history you know there have always been people, and therefore individualities, who have marked turning points in the life of your history. But be careful: I did not say that all these people are Masters of the highest evolution.
Do you think perhaps that the advent of an individuality in your century with the body of that individual that you know as Hitler could not have been put in place to move certain conditions? I know that this can be a dangerous discourse and that it can come to imagine the Lords of karma as heartless, ruthless tyrants, ready to send divine scourges and punishments to Earth.
In reality what happens, we always tell you, happens only to teach, to make people understand and, if you think about it even for a moment, you can realize how much the individual Hitler may have taught the race, despite all the lives that are. been killed through his actions. Weather
Readings for the interior: every day, a short spiritual reading of the Ifior Circle and of the Florence 77 Circle, on Whatsapp.
(Read only, cannot comment) To subscribe
Aphorisms of the Ifior Circle, on Wednesday on Facebook
Privacy policy of this site to consult before commenting, or subscribing to feeds.
I did not remember or perhaps I did not know at all that there were lords of karma.
Very interesting.
I still struggle to fully embrace these speeches. Maybe one day I will open up to a greater understanding, now I come to terms with what is there.
It is also difficult for me to understand these speeches
Behind the difficulty of understanding arises that SENSE of which everything is impregnated
Very dense and important text. Thank you.
Really important!
Doubt arise though.
It is very clear that it is the intention to generate karma, but if a first intention is followed by a different idea and therefore the intention changes? We probably don't talk about intention anymore, are we?
Another question concerns the intention to which no action follows. Is there a responsibility, or would it be better to say, do we generate more karma, deciding not to do and therefore not to interact with other people?