I have been watching your talk and I have the impression that you have lost sight – most of you – of what the purpose of these meetings is; certainly cutting hairs in four is fine, trying to understand this or that, it's all right, but we've lost sight of what the purpose of these latest interventions of ours was. Do you remember what the purpose was?
me / identity
Anger 17: The unity of the data circle, the unity of the ego [A41]
D – Once the request for understanding from the akasic starts, and we have the bodies structured for understanding, there is the right environment but we do not understand, therefore the request to the akasic goes back: what happens to the various bodies?
Character and Personality 12: Observing Personality and I [A23]
[…] What is the difference between the personality helium? We said: character is the basis for being able to interact during your experiences, the way this basis is expressed in your experiences is your personality.
Character and personality 7: temperament [A16]
There is another issue that seems to me not to have been understood: the speech of the Vibration First, if he was born before or after, what was it that modified the DNA, and so on. The situation, stated in very simple terms, is this: What does Vibration do first? It affects the akasic body.
Character and personality 6: the difference between personality and ego [A15]
D – For me, the concept of personality comes into conflict with the concept of ego: if at this moment they asked me what the difference is, or what things in common between these two concepts, I wouldn't have understood it.
A definition of 'crystallisation' [A7]
I have heard someone say: «There is however the improper and misleading use of the term «crystallizationbecause – as far as I know someone is defined as «crystallized» (in a given sector) who always reacts in the same way to an event; therefore the one who does not change his ego and continues to make the same mistakes. »
Victims of themselves [A4]
Let us ask ourselves for a moment the most logical question that it is possible to ask ourselves when dealing with this topic:
"Who is it that is a victim of itself?"
"There is no doubt: it is the ego!"