Questions about instinct and the unconditional flow of feeling

Question - Before I had the impression that you split the physical body, physiologically speaking, from everything else, that is, you kept it as if it were not too tied to the rest of the other bodies.

You talked about physiology, about foods not pleasing to the body, so it gave me the impression that this body was something apart. How much of our physiology, and I am also referring to the mental one, which we know to be dependent on our mental body, however if io I feel, I feel one thing; then it passes through mental mechanisms that I imagine to be physiological, the so-called programs, that is, those already preconstituted things that lead you to say that 2 plus 2 is 4. Within this program that I consider physiological, how much is there feel and how much is present in the mental body? In the context of the human mental mechanism, how does the latter intersect?

So: there is this blessed physical body which, of course, is connected with other bodies, as we have always said. Keep in mind that the physical body, from the point of view (we continue to say physiological even if it is not precise) it can be considered under 2 different aspects.

There is a whole part of mechanics and movements, vibrations, chemical reactions and so on that happen a instinctive level, without the individual realizing it, at least most of the time. Right? In reality this, on a physiological level, is 90% of what constitutes the physical body.

Then there is, instead, that part which is governed by the unconscious part of the individual and that causes, that I know, headaches or psychosomatic reactions or forgetfulness, memory loss, fatigue, ill will and many other physical attitudes, physical ailments, physical discomforts.

Then there is another part, very small in comparison to the rest, of the physical body which instead passes through the conscious level of your way of being; it is that small part that, for example, makes your mouth move in speaking, that makes words find and makes them come to the surface in the physical world; which causes you to open your eyes to look and so on; that moves certain muscles of the lips to smile or to kiss, or moves the hands to caress.
These are all physiological attitudes that go through the rationalization of your organ of thought (the brain, ed), that is, of the organ through which the impulses that come, remember, not only from the mental plane pass, but also from the astral plane and the Akasic plane, at times. Weather

D - Of this very small part that you said, many are fundamentally also reflections that fall within the range of chemical reactions and physiological interactions, but these are also reflections. Why this third distinction?

Because I wanted to emphasize the fact that, for example, a smile that can happen instinctively, is not actually instinctive, but most of the time, this spontaneous smile, from within you, from your interiority, starts.
But there are also cases where this same smile instead comes from your reasoning, when you make an effort, you want to smile. So there is a whole sum of reactions and behaviors of your body which is not only instinctual and which may not only be unconscious, but which is also directed by your rationality. Do you agree on this? Weather

Q - Do the spontaneous manifestations seem to come more easily from the Akasic body, while the more rationalized ones seem to come from the mental body?

Maybe you want to complicate things a bit because at this point, we should go and seek the intention for which one tries to smile and there is no need to go into the Scifo field this evening!

But the talk wasn't over yet. We still have to try to understand for a moment the relationship of feeling with all this.
Feeling, therefore, I had said that it is an impulse, it is a state of consciousness that tends to reach consciousness in the physical body, therefore to manifest itself within the physical plane.

Now, without a doubt, depending on theevolution of the individual and, therefore, of the strength of this feeling, the feeling will arrive more or less polluted, as we said before, on the physical plane. Here, the fact that it arrives more or less polluted to what is it?

It can be seen from the examples that you did. That is to say, when the feeling comes truly pure to consciousness on the physical plane, it will never occur to you to think about why you did an action, to ask yourself..
It is enough that it may occur to you to ask it to mean that your feeling could also have been that but, in reality, it contained something else that you had to understand and, therefore, it was not totally pure.

Weather

D - You can consider the hypothesis of doing an action because you feel, but this feeling more or less pure is in a context of life or of the person that is not at the highest levels. The so-called clear sky lightning. Then the average person might ask: why did I do this? I did it so instinctively. Could there be this possibility?

I would say no. I would say that, effectively, if one feels like doing something, he does it and, as we have often said, most of the time he doesn't even realize that he has followed his own feelings. Not only that, but whatever the social or environmental or relative family context in which he lives, if the individual has the feeling of doing a certain thing, you can rest assured that the individual will always do it, regardless of the context in which he is doing it.

I am speaking, of course, of feeling that comes true, clean to the conscience of the individual. When there are second thoughts or uncertainties, or an apparently felt action is taken and then there is a afterthoughthere, in those cases it is an indication that the feeling was polluted by something else; from a personal need, from a momentary selfishness, from the attempt to hide something and so on, and it is therefore time to try to understand what it was hiding. Weather

Q - So the reflex, even physiological, can be a movement of feeling?

Certainly yes, but without a doubt. And on the other hand remember that we have always said that the inner problems of the individual always arise from inner imbalances of energies, whether these imbalances come from unbalanced energies on the astral body, on the mental body, and so on.

The state of equilibrium it cannot help but bring a feeling of peace, of well-being which, perhaps, will last only until another impulse that is not clean, not purified, comes to upset this condition of equilibrium.

At times it has happened to you, it happens to everyone in the course of your existence, to have a sudden and inexplicable moment, apparently without a reason, a moment of serenity, of tranquility, in which you were at peace with the world, happy with everything and everyone; yet if you looked around there was no real cause for this mood. Here this is the flow of a clean feeling that causes a moment of balance within the individual.

Weather

Readings for the interior: every day, a short spiritual reading of the Ifior Circle and of the Florence 77 Circle, on Whatsapp. 
(Read only, cannot comment) To subscribe

Aphorisms of the Ifior Circle, on Wednesday on Facebook

Privacy policy of this site to consult before commenting, or subscribing to feeds.


Print Friendly, PDF & Email

5 comments on “Questions on instinct and the unconditioned flow of feeling”

  1. It is clear how important and useful it is to work to let your feelings flow in a pure way.
    I believe zazen helps us in this because it exposes us, opens us, to feeling, in a particular way capable of radiating the day.

    Reply

Leave a comment