D - Before, the subject of suicide was touched upon. I wanted to know, if this is a step already planned, or is it to be considered an accident? That is, does a person fall the moment he decides to commit suicide, or is it already part of his programming, if we want to say so?
This is the typical question that cannot be answered generically. The speech can only be done on a case-by-case basis. Both one hypothesis and the other can be true, it depends on the people, on theevolution, from situations, from all those factors that lead to suicide.
D - But, if, as you told us, the day of each person's passing is already marked down to the minute, even death through suicide should fall under this law, let's say it is marked.
Death is marked, not the way to die. He may be undecided whether to commit suicide or not, then he decides not to and at that moment a tile falls on his head and dies anyway.
D - Earlier it was said that every person dies at the exact appointed moment, it's a bit programmed, isn't it ?; therefore, in the event that a person dies in an accident (I make a more specific speech; the death of those three Neapolitan children burned alive was impressed on me), here is a child, who dies at the age of one year, what karma can it move? He did not have the opportunity to experience him and therefore to understand. There are deaths that leave me perplexed.
In the case of such a small child it is undoubtedly the solution of a karma on his part, because, you know, the situation of the entity, in the moment in which it incarnates, is a mixture of joy, fear, the desire for the physical matter that attracts it; it's all a very complex situation inside.
And then there is this interruption of life, for which there is certainly suffering even if the child is very small, but not only physical suffering; there is the suffering of the entity to which this possibility of incarnating, of continuing life is blocked. So this is the payment of a karmic debt of some kind previously incurred.
But consider other things: this situation is not a karma only for the child, but it is a karma, in the meantime, for the people around him, and, in particular cases, like the one you mentioned, it is a karma that is reflected, somehow, about all the people who listen to what happened and who participate in some way; therefore, it is a bit like a stone thrown into a pond, spreading its karmic waves all around, so that many people, through this experience, have a little more understanding that they otherwise would not have.
Q - Is it easy for this entity to reincarnate, or has it already understood by doing this type of experience?
No; no doubt, she will reincarnate again; we say that in such a case there is no understanding, there is only the payment of a previous karmic situation.
An example that can be given at the moment is that of an entity - embodied in this child, who died so young in this way - that in the previous life was excessively attached to matter, to life, to things; but here, then, to make him lose this attachment a little, he has a later life in which, due to this attachment to matter, which he clearly carried with sé from the previous life, all the matter is taken away from him in this so abrupt way precisely to make him become aware of his attachment, a consciousness that he will then naturally develop in a subsequent life.
Q - Does the same thing also apply to children who are not born due to an abortion?
It can be valid, yes.
Q - I have to ask you this question: do we have to assume that God or a higher entity keeps all this accounting with such precision, with such scrupulous attention?
He doesn't need the abacus!
D - I understand.
Readings for the interior: every day, a short spiritual reading of the Ifior Circle and of the Florence 77 Circle, on Whatsapp.
(Read only, cannot comment) To subscribe
No… ask your question; it was just a joke to raise the mood.
Q - I was wondering this: is there a whole warp on this sequence of events?
This is what is difficult to make you understand: there is no need for an abacus, as I said before, jokingly, for the simple reason that (according to the image dictated by the Orientals), when God dreams of reality, he already dreams the whole dream ; and in the dream, he has already understood everything that happens. So it's all even, the bill; it is you who do not yet know that the balance will be balanced in the end, because you live it from within the dream, not from the outside; but the design is already complete, already finished, it is not a negative, passive balance sheet, but it is always, necessarily, in balance, because the film is already complete in all its parts, already balanced.
Q - I have heard that after death there is this kind of examination that we do, this self-examination; and then this kind of self-judgment. I wanted to ask: with what part of ourselves do we judge ourselves? Why - I asked myself - will we be honest and just with ourselves, in this self-judgment, or not?
The thing is rather complex, because in the moment that the physical body is abandoned, the conscience withdraws on the other planes of existence, a little at a time; you know that one has to strip off the various bodies in order to return again to the Akasic plane; and then you will know what will happen next: whether it will incarnate again, or not; and so on.
This self-judgment - which the entity fulfills - it accomplishes as it strips itself of the various bodies; then he will do it through the examination of his emotions, his desires, first; then, through the examination of one's thoughts and so on; but it will not be from within these planes - which he is going through - that he will perform the judgment, but it will be from within the plane of consciousness.
It will then be the Akasic body, which will draw the conclusions of what it has done, examining all the data that come from the examination of the various drives, the various needs, the various thoughts and so on.
Certainly it is not said - and you know it - that the Akasic body draws the right conclusions, because it is not yet completely structured; therefore he does not have all the elements to be sure that what he has understood is really right; and that is why a later incarnation is needed, to verify his understandings, whether they were right or not.
D - So, practically, even this famous self-judgment is all an illusion, a bluff too, because there is never anything right. Io, for example, I have done an action – in this life – which I believe I have done as a good deed; then I pass and when I'm there I realize that it wasn't good (for example, it was a selfish action); At this point, I believe my self-judgment, but I'm not sure it's right!
You will notice it later in the next life, if it was right; because in the next life the situation will arise in which you will have the opportunity to repeat the same action, with the same intentions you had before: and from how you react, then - in a subsequent self-judgment - you will be able to understand if you had really understood or less. It is not a certainty that you acquire immediately, except in particular cases: there must be a verification of what you have done or experienced; there will be no need for verification when there is such an understanding that there is no need to incarnate again. Georgei
Readings for the interior: every day, a short spiritual reading of the Ifior Circle and of the Florence 77 Circle, on Whatsapp.
(Read only, cannot comment) To subscribe
Aphorisms of the Ifior Circle, on Wednesday on Facebook
Privacy policy of this site to consult before commenting, or subscribing to feeds.
Not free from inner protest against such strong forms of suffering as that of the children mentioned, I still feel a breath bigger than me in all this and I just say an amen, hoping to understand better and better, without protest and with serenity. Thank you.
Amen.
There is no certainty in the process of self-awareness even after passing away. It pushes to cultivate Trust at the highest possible level
Useful reading to clarify the karma that children who die young pay and how the examination of life after death takes place.
Why do we need to ask? Because this need to explore something that is not explorable. Do we lack the Trust? But if we miss it, why believe what has been said? Is it consoling perhaps?
By its nature, mankind is led to investigate. Research has led me to become more and more aware of my limits, but also to cultivate trust, becoming moment by moment more aware of the illusion of forms and of what we define as real. What the Guides describe, with respect to karma or to the already planned design of our path of incarnation, I welcome, but I don't have the understandings to fully mine what they say, nor can I say "yes it is so" ". I feel that it can make sense, that this sense leads me to increase compassion and trust towards others and towards myself. It calms the anguish of living a life, the meaning of which is increasingly difficult to find, opens a passage towards Unity which promises to be the only path to be pursued.