But why did I say that all of this will be important for thinking and discussing about psychosomatisms? Because this is a physical mechanism of explanation of what is the genesis of one psychosomatism, Right?
A desire, an emotion, a thought that fails to reach consciousness, are nevertheless vibrations: they continue to collide with the individual's bodies until they find a vibration to some extent - even minimal - similar, and through this similar vibration they come to manifest themselves. on the physical plane.
However, they do not manifest themselves as their essence is, in manifesting themselves through something - so to speak - in parallel, something contiguous that is next to it and which, being different, may lead astray, it is therefore difficult to examine and understand that what can it be.
However, over time, by dint of letting these similar stimuli, these similar vibrations pass in some way, the individual will find himself in front of the possibility of understanding the psychosomatic symptom what genesis, what inner cause does it have, and therefore open the way to an improvement and an expansion of one's consciousness.
D - In this regard, when we say that the body has in sé of self-healing processes, can also be understood in this sense: that is, if he understands, if he lets these stimuli pass in some way, does he also automatically heal those psychosomatic symptoms that afflicted him?
Psychosomatic symptoms only heal when understanding occurs: it has nothing to do with the stimulus, if not indirectly.
Understanding takes place within the akasic body: in the akasic body one becomes aware, one understands what the individuality at that moment must understand; then the stimulus no longer has any need to influence and therefore also the symptom is slowly dying out, even if a certain echo may remain for some time in the physical body, because reaction times differ from situation to situation.
Q - So what is the function of this awareness of the symptom that the individual realizes on the physical plane?
Certainly it has the function of drawing attention to the symptom and what it represents, and trying to make it open those channels that can allow the real stimulus to reach the light, thus being able to become aware of it in the right way, without any more distortion fixed by the necessarily having to go around the barricades by masking other things.
Q - So the inhibition of the symptom can be negative?
Ah, this without a doubt: not only "can" be negative, but "is always" negative; and moreover, in addition to causing a greater increase in tensions within the individual in which the symptom is inhibited, it removes elements from the individual to be able to understand, because inhibiting the symptom simply means making the impulse, which is clashing against the censorship of his body, he moves towards other points of the body in order to be able to manifest himself, with the famous displacement of which - if I am not mistaken - our friend Freud speaks.
D - Even the doctor does a negative action, sometimes ...
I would say, in these cases, almost always: also because from the outside it is difficult for anyone to really do something; since, in the case of psychosomatisms, the only person who can heal himself is the sick person.
It is not a virus, an external cause that acts in the individual, and which therefore can be somehow understood and healed by others, but it is something that only that creature can truly understand and heal; and psychoanalysts and psychologists in general are well aware of this, who often clash with their sense of powerlessness in trying to heal psychically ill people, as in reality the cases of healing are very few and are due to understanding on the part of the so-called sick.
Q - What you have explained to us now, that is this vibration, which tries to pass through this body, on a mental level could be intuition, or is it that aggressive aspect that you said, which instead of a defense mechanism is an attack mechanism?
This is the other side of the defense mechanism, that is, the spark that attacks in order to advance, to advance theevolution? Is this the attack aspect of the mechanism? Let's say it could be defensive by theIo, towards what he does not like to see, and attack by the upper part of the individual to try instead to balance the situation; because the spark undoubtedly always tends towards a situation of equilibrium, as it wants to reunite with God, and reuniting with God means reuniting with absolute equilibrium, with what Everything is, so what is its natural condition? The perfect balance.
D - The ego would tend to crystallize, to remain as it is.
No! The ego, on the other hand, tends to shift the balance completely on his side, so that he is the center of the universe, and not others: none other than him!
D - However, while the psychosomatic symptom disappears, I have understood the thing, but I have no awareness of the understanding.
It is not necessary, as you well know, that there be this awareness; not only that, but if there has certainly been this understanding, there will be no return of that symptom or that type of problem, absolutely.
Readings for the interior: every day, a short spiritual reading of the Ifior Circle and of the Florence 77 Circle, on Whatsapp.
(Read only, cannot comment) To subscribe
D - Now, this awareness, will I never have it, or will I have it?
Awareness will no doubt find it again, at least when you are conscious within your Akasic body. Conscious, of course.
D - So: I have therefore reached understanding, even if I did not have this awareness. So the awareness reach it later?
Of course. Let's say understanding and awareness you have reached them anyway, even if your ego and your mind and your lower bodies have no consciousness or awareness of having come to understand or be aware.
No doubt it cannot come at another time; understanding occurs through the confrontation with experience.
D - So that process of understanding that was described in the past: knowledge, awareness, understanding, in this case seems to me mixed up. I would have awareness later ...
No… One moment… The speech of consciousness, awareness, understanding it was not attributed to the embodied being, to the embodied part of the individual: it was a process that concerned the Akasic body. And, I repeat, the embodied individual may not actually be aware at all of what is happening to him, if not, at the limit, of the states of consciousness, tranquility, serenity or tension that he has inside.
It is a bit of the same reason why we were saying that none of you, within the physical plane, as long as the individual is embodied in the physical plane, can truly realize what his evolution is.
Q - So the comprehension process in its entirety takes place at the Akasic level?
Of course. And so - I add - imagine you who absolutely pretend to judge the evolution of others ...
D - Scifo, another question: if one realizes that one has certain psychosomatic symptoms (which then seem to be 90, if not 100% of the diseases that exist), for example, I don't know, if one, let's suppose, has vision defects; for the whole life he lives - since medical science has not found a system to solve these things, at least currently - it does not solve this problem of vision defect, does it mean that he has not understood what caused that psychosomatism?
Assuming that, of course, this is not simply due to a physiological or pathological cause.
D - And in that case there?
In that case the physiological or pathological cause can be treated there, if it is still possible from human science to cure it: in short, it is necessary to see if it is a psychosomatism or not a psychosomatism.
What then can certainly be said that 90, if not 99% or even 100% of diseases are actually psychosomatic, this is also true: however there are psychosomatisms for which the individual can do something and psychosomatisms for which the individual cannot do anything. For example, the psychosomatisms of diseases due to karmic influences are of this type.
Q - Can a psychosomatism turn into an organic disease?
Ah, yes ... Of course. This certainly.
Q - What about normal organ aging, though?
aging normal organs, as you said yourself, it is normal.
And yet that too is a psychosomatism, as it corresponds to the evolutionary needs of the individual, and therefore is directed and commanded by his superior structures. So much so that, if you pay attention around you, there are individuals who physically age much earlier or much later than what is the norm, what is considered the norm of your race at the moment.
D - There is the possibility that an individual in physical life, as an embodied person, can understand or know if his psychosomatism is one of those that in the embodied life he will not be able to resolve or if he will be able to resolve it: is there this possibility?
Mah ... Look ... I would say that it doesn't matter, whether I can understand it or not; as the individual and the Ego itself necessarily tend - inevitably - to stay as good as possible: therefore the individual will try to do something, and then we will see if he can, if he will be able, if he really wants to change the things.
D - So it is a question of will, of training the will ...
In large part, yes. Creatures, serenity to you. Scifo
Readings for the interior: every day, a short spiritual reading of the Ifior Circle and of the Florence 77 Circle, on Whatsapp.
(Read only, cannot comment) To subscribe
Aphorisms of the Ifior Circle, on Wednesday on Facebook
Privacy policy of this site to consult before commenting, or subscribing to feeds.
A look from the top of the mountain helps to deal with things. Thank you
Understanding takes place in Consciousness. Sometimes it happens to believe that you have understood, when in truth we have only grasped a content with the mind. Thank you.
"A desire, an emotion, a thought that fails to reach consciousness, are nevertheless vibrations: they continue to collide with the individual's bodies until they find a vibration to some extent - even minimal - similar, and through this similar vibration they reach manifest on the physical plane.
However, they do not manifest themselves as their essence is, in manifesting themselves through something - so to speak - in parallel, something contiguous that is next to it and which, being different, may lead astray, it is therefore difficult to examine and understand that what could it be. "
I am having a hard time understanding these lines in a concrete way: what a similar vibration is and what it means to manifest itself in a parallel way. I need concrete examples.
The concept expressed is that the data collected by the Akasic body through the experiences can come not directly from the vibrations connected to the element in need of understanding but from the vibrations of similar elements (for example friendship / love) that collect useful factors to clarify the main understanding. Therefore, the expansion of feeling takes place thanks to the vibratory interconnection between the multiple evolutionary needs of the individual.
In accordance with the concept that all is One or, more traditionally, the saying that the ways of the Lord are infinite.
Understanding occurs on the Akasic plane, even if you do not understand on the mental plane. This pacifies me in part, with my poor ability to understand the facts. In other words, I hope that all the experiences, especially the most painful ones, of which today I struggle to see results, in terms of evolution, have not been in vain.
I was wondering why some somatisms disappeared, but I did not know what understandings I had reached. Now I finally know that we are not aware of it but only consciousness is.
This post got unlocked and I was able to read it as a psychosomatic symptom that I couldn't get over ...
Now I understand
Now I am aware
From reading this concept arises: the ability to let life pass through.
Whenever the various bodies of which the individuality is constituted obstruct the passage of the first vibration, "frictions" are created which manifest themselves on the physical plane.
For someone like me who works in the health field with sufficient experience and sensitivity, this mechanism is extremely clear: treatment, in all its forms, is the ability to trigger, or at least the attempt to trigger in the sick subject a change in his state that force him to break that vicious circuit in which he is chained.
The major understandings happened without my being mentally aware of it, of course it is. Thank you.