Returning to the contestability of what I said, perhaps - how can we say? - a little troubled by His Majesty the Pope's latest positions, you have completely overlooked what I have said regarding sexuality and genetics.
Yet there was a reasoning to be done that would undoubtedly lead to questioning how much io I was saying, because there was something that you certainly would not have taken into account in your reasoning: from my words it becomes clear that sexuality is influenced (the male or female gender, I mean) and in some way activated or decided by the body Akasic.
Agree? But - I ask you, and you should have asked yourself too - how is it possible that the Akasic body influences and decides the sexuality of its lower bodies when this sexuality, according to genetics, is not activated only by something that belongs to it? This would mean that then the Akasic body also influences something concerning the non-its part of the genetic chain.
That the Akasic body can affect its portion of the physical body that comes to give sexuality when the physical body begins to be constituted may be right and understandable, but that instead it affects - I know - the genetic chain carried by the other parent seems enough to me. unlikely, because at that point it would have to invade the sphere of activity and consciousness of another Akasic body, right?
D - It was not understood well.
D - No, I did not understand well.
D - If you can repeat ...
So, let's go back to the story of the bee and the flower! Do you know what happens when a new life is born?
D - Yes, yes, okay.
No, you agree but others don't understand, so let's start from the beginning. So who is it that explains to me how a new life is born? Starting from the final part, we know the initial part.
Q - Are you talking about fertilization?
Yes exactly. We pass immediately to the moment of actual conception, of when the new physical individual is formed.
D - Practically the male and female sex cells unite and form the first embryo, which will then gradually develop.
So there is a part of physical matter that comes from an individual and a part of physical matter that comes from another individual, they put together this patrimony of qualities and then, from the union of a certain gene or another gene, it is defined sexuality, type of sexuality, sex: male or female.
Now, if we have said that the Akasic body influences sexuality, this can be valid when the fetus, the embryo, is already constituted: it can certainly influence these genetic chains and do something. However, as you know, whether it is male or female depends ... on what?
D - From the two beings.
D - Give the two factors X and Y.
D - There is also a race among the spermatozoa, which are the ones that can carry either X or Y while the egg always has the X. There is a race to who comes first.
Let's take it easy so that everyone understands. Suppose that the new individual who will be born has this beautiful egg X and the sperm Y has to arrive to give… To give what? Male or female?
D - Male.
Well done! Now, the Akasic body that must constitute the new physical body, how can it influence a part of matter of another individual to get a sperm Y instead of X?
D - Could change the reaction of the soil surrounding the egg so that one sperm population is favored instead of another, for example.
It could also be, but the thing is even more precise, because we know that our Akasic body needs a certain body to carry out certain experiences it has planned, so it seems that it must be a specific spermatozoon and not another. And then it is no longer enough to prepare the environment, because chance would always remain.
D - A particular vibration.
Oh, you've come as close to understanding as possible! You know - because you should know by now - that our Akasic body has its vibrations based on the understandings it has and also based on the misunderstandings it has. Right?
These understandings and non-understandings, these vibratory effects that move within the Akasic body cause that, in descending towards the physical plane, they attract the appropriate matter for this type of vibration that it possesses. Right?
This type of vibrations, which therefore already lead to the presuppositions of the type of body that the individual must have, form a sort of halo around the new being that is to be born; around the egg, in the case we had chosen.
This type of vibration is so complex, a kind of "vibratory genetic code”, To become a key that will be able to attract that and only "that" sperm that has the same kind of vibrations that match and combine in the best way with that egg. And since the possible combinations are not millions but billions, infinite, that's it there is only that possibility, for that single sperm, to get to fertilize that egg; then to create that type of body.
See what you could dispute, dear ones?
[...] D - Scifo, sorry, the same discourse (since I have also read a bit what concerns astral influences, cosmic energies ...) can then be applied to the astral influences that affect the new body; Is the preeminence always of the Akasic body which, through vibrations, causes these influences to be determined in one way or another?
Certainly. It is the "so high, so low" that we so often bring up. Certainly there is a repetition of the phenomenon, of the mechanics of what happens; so all the lower bodies are constituted according to these vibratory attractions or repulsions emitted by the Akasic body.
Q - And this vibratory halo around the egg begins to form just before fertilization or is it a long process?
The vibratory halo actually exists from the moment in which the Akasic body is projected towards the physical plane, therefore even before - all in all - that it has lower matter, because it first builds a vibratory halo that passes through the mental, then through the 'astral and then comes to the physical.
Readings for the interior: every day, a short spiritual reading of the Ifior Circle and of the Florence 77 Circle, on Whatsapp.
(Read only, cannot comment) To subscribe
D - Yes, but by choosing that particular egg.
D - Sorry, Scifo, I read somewhere that conception at the level I don't know if only astral, but in any case not material, takes place four months before physical conception. It's true?
I knew that elephants take several months, but cases of human conception several months ago, it seems to me enough…
D - No, maybe I haven't made myself clear.
Then maybe you better explain yourself.
D - So, I read that conception, at the energy level, that is the meeting, the fertilization, happens ... not on the physical plane: on the physical plane it happens at that moment and then the baby needs nine months to grow; ... at the level of energies, I don't know about the astral encounter… I read that this fertilization takes place 4 months before the material one, the physical one. Did I make myself clear?
Yes Yes sure. But you made it clear even before. The fact is that, in my opinion, it is nonsense to say such a thing; that is one cannot apply a temporal term of the physical plane to the other planes of existence.
D - Scifo, sorry; you said before that Akasic crosses the mental, then the astral to get to the physical, before ...
Remember that alas, unfortunately, we say "cross" but it is not a crossing.
D - Yes, but whose mental and astral? Because this child who is to be born does not yet have a constituted astral and mental body!
Certainly, however, it crosses all the planes and, by crossing the planes, it collects energy and matter from all the planes, attracts to sé this subject.
D - Yes, but this child who is to be born still has nothing in place.
I know it. Precisely. You consider this vibration that goes through part of the Akasic and arrives on the mental plane ...
D - But on the mental level of whom? Each of us has a mental plan.
No. You are confusing mental body with mental plane. It's different.
D - Ah, sorry. It's true.
Often we fall into this mistake, sometimes me too!
Now I leave you, but before I still wanted to say something for a moment, returning to the discourse of 80-120 incarnations.
In theory, you think: the individual had to live 120 incarnations, but he was so good that he gets to live 80. The other 40 lives, which inevitably are already in the Eternal Present only that, in this case, it is evidently been "screwed", the Eternal Present !, what happens to them?
D - That's not true!
Is there anyone associated with these 40 lives that eventually remain, or remain only ghosts for the benefit of those who, alas, are forced to live alongside these ghosts because individuality has evolved earlier and there is nothing to be done?
D - But if it is already written! I'm in bad shape again!
D - But if we said that somewhere it has already been decided, that has nothing to do with it. There aren't these 40, they can't exist.
They cannot exist, no doubt. Oh, thank goodness! I just wanted to check if you understood. Well, I've talked enough for tonight. Creatures, I greet you with great affection on my part. Scifo.
Privacy policy of this site to consult before commenting,
or subscribe to feeds.
I don't think I understand the concept of 40 lives well. It seems to me that there is a contradiction in what Scifo says. First he says that the 40 lives are already in the Eternal Present, and then he concludes that "they cannot exist". Do they exist at the level of "probability"?
The speech is very complex and, honestly, I'm not sure I understand it completely myself!
I believe that the focal point to keep in mind is that individuality is not the physical body: in the Eternal Present there is the totality of lives on the physical plane (including the variables) both to keep the very fabric of physical reality coherent and to allow the experiences faced by embodied individualities,
In those theoretical 40 lives not lived but present for the needs that I have just said, there are no entities connected to those physical bodies that exist only as a necessity (a sort of useful extras ...) to allow the correct and constant development of the Drawing.
I hope I haven't made things worse, but I don't know how to explain myself better and, anyway, this is what I think I understand,
I try to say what I seem to have understood.
Scifo states: "In theory, you think: the individual had to live 120 incarnations, but he was so good that he gets to live 80. The other 40 lives, which inevitably are already in the Eternal Present only that, in this case, evidently the Eternal Present has been "cheated"! What happens to them? "
The Eternal Present is not a project given a priori, a hypothetical drawing on each of us, but an archive of what has happened, happens and will happen in becoming: the EP of one who has lived 80 lives in total, contains exactly the 80 lives (including their variants) that he lived.
If he had lived 50, the EP archive would contain 50 lives.
The question of the 40 lives brought up by Scifo is a trap to verify the understanding of the constitutive principle of the EP ...
At a deeper level of reality, existence is constituted from vibrations.
The planes of existence communicate through vibrations.
Immersed in the matter of the physical plane we find it hard to remember this.
Thank you.
So to determine the sex of the unborn child are the vibra, ions of his Akasic body, if I understand correctly.
Interesting