The tool of logic to approach the Reality of the One [IF83.3focus]

[...] In reality ourselves, when we speak of "understanding the One" we are saying - to be good - nonsense, as the One cannot be understood by the mind of each of you nor understood by yours. same akasic body: the One, as I had tried to make you understand, can only be "felt".

“Very well – I imagine you will say – but then why is our akasic body, of which the feel is the most powerful expression, does it not come to feel the One?”

This is quite simple to explain: the feeling of your akasic body is not complete, it gradually expands and, obviously, only a complete feeling can truly understand the One made up of infinite feeling, of feeling complete in all its nuances, in short: from Sentire Assoluto.

At this point, I think you may even feel a little demoralized and the most combative among you will have already thought: "But then what do they talk us to do about these things, if we don't have the possibility to understand them?".

Remember that, however it may be, you are on your planet to understand Reality and, since the Reality that you can observe is none other than the One, disguised as "relative", here you have to try, however, to get closer to understanding the Whole it falls within your precise evolutionary duty. 

  • Readings for the interior: every day a short spiritual reading of the Cerchio Ifior and the Cerchio Firenze 77, up Whatsapp and Telegram.
  • Summary of the philosophical teaching of the Ifior Circle: HOW CONSCIOUSNESS CREATES PERSONAL REALITY, you can order here the book. If you're reading this and want support, write.

No doubt you will have more urgent things to deal with over the course of your days and, apparently, more useful in the immediate future or more rewarding for your Io, but also, in the end, they are but an indirect way to experience the One and, through experimentation, perhaps to grasp some of its nuances that, otherwise, would have escaped you.

On the other hand, while it is true that the One will not be understood by any of you until your reunion with the One itself takes place, it is also true that you have been offered ways to help your clambering along the path. of understanding.
One such avenue is logic.

The Cosmos and all of Reality are, necessarily, subject to logic: we have seen that everything proceeds from the One, therefore it has its cause in the One itself, from which all the Reality. 

If we could hypothesize that even the smallest portion of Reality was not dependent on the One and, therefore, was outside the cause-effect process, we would necessarily have to arrive at saying that the One would not be Absolute; that, consequently, Reality itself could not be a single whole, and that it could not exist but would tend to disintegrate into many different realities with the consequence that none of them could be recognizable as Absolute Reality.

Taking the reasoning to the extreme, it can be affirmed that if Reality were not logical it would be illogical, therefore unreal and, consequently, not only would it not have the possibility of existing, but it would not even have the possibility of constituting itself, as its elements constitutive, having causes not connected to each other and, therefore, not homologous, would lead to its disintegration from its hypothetical beginning. Vito

It is the possibility of carrying out logical chains with one's own mental body that allows man, if not to arrive at understanding the One, at least to complete the journey up to Him by going up the chain of cause and effect.

To give a concrete example, you will also be able to discuss the truth or otherwise, the credibility or otherwise of what we have been telling you in these long years of teaching; this is right, logical and even desirable.

But foolish is he who believes what we say, believing that our words come from disembodied entities. The state of not belonging to the physical world is certainly not a reason for greater credibility nor is it necessarily a label of authority. Many other sources – or at least self-styled sources, coming from hypothetical discarnate (and, sometimes, even incarnate) masters – exist, and they are of a depressing banality or such a paucity, to be demonstrated without the need for further discussions that they no longer possess the physical body is certainly not synonymous with wisdom, or even just simple common sense. 

Yet many uncritically attribute to these sources the dignity of great teachings, perhaps even just for the fact that the name or words of Christ are mentioned several times.
As if putting a hundred different herbs acclaimed by the greatest chefs in a pot were enough to make a good minestrone!

You do not have the absolute certainty of who we are and we could perhaps also be counted among the sources that enjoy boasted and undeserved credit. 
Only you, personally, can understand if and how much importance you attach to what we have told you over these long years; and it is, without a doubt, by accepting what we propose that you will truly be able to manifest your tendency towards the One.

The truth is that we are not important, except for your selves that derive satisfaction and fulfillment from being able to even think that they have been in contact with supposed disembodied teachers, theoretical sources of supreme truth.
Perhaps our words are important.

But they are so to the extent that you understand, assimilate, adhere to them not out of simple faith but because, through your logic, what we tell you gives you the reason for so many things that, otherwise, you would not be able to explain, broadens your horizons of understanding, change your vision of life, mitigate the pain you encounter every day, faithful and constant companion of your evolutionary path.

In examining what we bring to you, make sure you don't stop at the words, don't cling to them like ivy clings to the wall: always remember that we use imperfect instruments to speak to you and there are thousands and thousands of reasons why a word can be said in the wrong way or at the wrong time, so that it is more the sense and logic of the speech that convinces you and not the mere external and formal appearance.

Therefore, be as flexible as possible, holding dear to your heart, your mind and your conscience not the terms used in telling you what we tell you, but the logical sense than, from time to time, we offer you.

Whoever sticks to the word demonstrates that, deep down, he is not yet ready to truly approach the Truth because the Truth is not made of words but of Feeling, even if words can and must be used in a thousand ways to better clarify to the conscious self on the physical world what one is feeling, in order to maintain constant viability the bridge that exists between your being embodied in physical plane matter and your contemporary being present, with your consciousness, on the spiritual planes.

Always remember that – as we have said more than once over the years – even what we tell you is not the Absolute Truth, but it is only that portion of the Absolute Truth that we, personally, have come to understand while we were doing, get tired, the same path that you are now walking with just as much effort.

Know that the Truth impregnates all Reality in its multiple facets but that the Absolute Truth is not placed in the akasic plane, nor in the Third Logos, nor in the Second Logos: it resides only in the One and only the One can possess it completely.

For this reason we recently told you, for example, that where the permanent archetypes doesn't actually have a great importance, because for you, for your possibility of understanding Reality, it changes absolutely nothing to imagine them on the first Logos or, absurdly, on the physical plane, while it can change your conception of life - and, therefore, how you relate to it – knowing how they affect you and how you interact with them.

And it's the "understand your life” the first reason for your immersion in physical matter. Unfortunately, very often this does not happen and you dwell more on unimportant details than on what is more important to you, perhaps coming to angrily discussing among yourselves over questions that are very reminiscent of the famous dissertations on the number of angels who can stand on the head of a pin, or the monotonous and hypnotic enumeration of the thousand names of God.

Search, but what importance can it have if the One is called God, Zeus, Allah, Jehova, Vishnu, Rama, Odin or Taratata? History has amply shown you that giving a different name to the One has led to the extermination of entire populations. And it has already happened too many times over the millennia, in your small way, not to make the same mistakes.

Don't make our words a matter of culture.
Of course, culture is also useful and can help in the exercise of logic but, often, it proves to be a heavy chain for those who possess it, because it ends up becoming not a means to understand more organically but an end to be achieved, perhaps to feed and satisfy the desire of one's ego to feel one step ahead of the others by covering up with "I know", which would be hilarious if it weren't for the sadness for such an unmotivated presumption not to get the better of it.

There are countless embodied people, of humble origins and devoid of any cultural notion who, too, feel and support the logic of Reality better than learned scientists or illustrious personalities renowned for their culture. 

“Be simple” and “Let your say yes, yes, no, no” it was said in another time.

This does not mean disregarding what one knows and behaving with deliberate humility, but rather being able to draw the essential from the reality one faces without masking it under an avalanche of frills that make it more difficult to understand and communicate.

Because - and this is the last thing I want to tell you - remember that whoever has understood a truth, however small it may be, has the responsibility to preserve it intact and suggest it - never imposing it - on creatures that have not yet reached it but are tending towards it. Weather

We would like to translate this site into English with a neural translator: you want to make your little contribution?

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

3 comments on “The tool of logic to approach the Reality of the One [IF83.3focus]”

  1. It remains difficult for me to understand this text in the concreteness of the daily dimension, or at least I feel that theory adds nothing to adherence to the Way.

    Reply
  2. "Truth is not made of words but of Feeling,"

    One could also say: "The Truth must be contemplated and not understood with the intellect alone".

    But contemplation is a process in which words and logic enter fully.

    Reply

Reply to Mariella Cancel reply