As we have often told you, it is difficult for human beings to form an idea of what the One really is like. And this fact is perfectly understandable if we refer to the tools that the embodied individual possesses to elaborate his own conceptions.
Let's see these tools in a slightly more detailed way, trying to discover the reasons (at least the simplest and most immediate ones) why, to the human being, the Reality of the One turns out to be extremely difficult to understand.
Man, you know by now, he uses his own bodies to define his own experience and to relate to reality, whether we are dealing with the subjective and relative one or, instead, with the objective and absolute one, which we have often called Reality with a capital "R".
1- The first body through which he mediates Reality is the physical body. This body arrives at the perception of matter through its various characteristics (for example the shape, the color, the sounds) and it is evident that it cannot be able to represent the One in an exact way: how can it be possible for man to imagine himself what has no shape since it contains all forms, what has no color since it contains all colors, what has no sound because it contains all sounds, when it is used to representing the Real to itself through a relatively simple and not infinite range of attributes , usually borrowed from his perceptions of what he is experiencing within the physical plane?
- Readings for the interior: every day a short spiritual reading of the Cerchio Ifior and the Cerchio Firenze 77, up Whatsapp and Telegram.
- Summary of the philosophical teaching of the Ifior Circle: HOW CONSCIOUSNESS CREATES PERSONAL REALITY, you can order here the book. If you're reading this and want support, write.
Apart from this concept – already for sé more than sufficient to make us understand the impossibility for the physical body to perceive the One in its totality - it is evident that said physical body can only have the perception of what is typical of physical matter (the only one that has characteristics for it perceivable and interpretable), so that the realistic perception, on its part, of the One – made up of the entire range of materials that structure Reality and not just of physical matter – results, and this is so obvious as to be trivial, impossible.
2- A step forward in the broadening of the vision of the One is accomplished by the simultaneous presence, in the human being, of a astral body, with its matter (so different from the physical one) able to perceive, interact with the other astral matter and to represent for man – understood as a unit – the most suitable instrument to come into contact with that other part of the Reality made up of emotions and desires.
3- It is evident, however, that it is still a limiting vision in the perception of the One and also the contemporary presence of a mental body – despite the additional tools that it offers to man in favor of his possibility of elaborating his personal perception of the One according to chains of thought – basically, the terms of the problem do not change much: the One continues to remain outside the scope of understanding of the embodied being.
Let's be clear for a moment: although human thought can build reasoning and logical processes in an attempt to understand the Reality of the Absolute, its work is based on premises - however they may be - so relative and strictly dependent on what the reasoning man is , from moment to moment, that this relativity can only induce him to build within himself an image of the Absolute strictly dependent on subjectively important factors: from the needs that man feels within him to his physical, emotional and intellectual, from the experiences he has had up to that moment to the hopes he nourishes towards what he will still live in the continuation of his human journey.
4- Apparently the discourse seems to have the possibility of achieving a rapid change for the better when one takes into account that other instrument which belongs to man and which, not being transitory but having its own continuity of presence along the entire evolutionary path of the individuality , appears to be able to greatly change the possibility of perception/understanding of the One by man, considering its function of connection between the temporary part of the individual (transient bodies) and his being linked, however, inextricably to 'One; this, of course, referring to the Akasic body of the human being, that body of consciousness that seems to act, in some way, as an interpreter of Reality, perceiving it through what we have called "feel”, or the ability to appropriate (it would be better to say “re-appropriate”) the juice of Reality understood through having experienced the subjective reality experienced during incarnation.
To be honest, it is not that even considering the presence of the akasic body as an additional and constitutive element of the human being, things can really change a lot and the One appears closer and more understandable.
Certainly, from the speeches made during the teaching, it seems that the tool par excellence to finally have a real and objective vision of the One could be precisely the akasic body, as it possesses the sense of feeling, considered one of the attributes of the A same which, in fact, can also be described, from a philosophical point of view, as the Absolute Feeling, since it must, for obvious reasons of its unavoidable totality and all-encompassing nature, include in Itself all existing feelings.
In reality, man's feelings can indeed arrive at perceiving the existence of the One but, without a doubt, not even it can have the possibility of representing it in a more truthful way: the very fact that man's feelings expand in the rediscovery of himself indicates the limitation of his possibility of embracing the totality of Reality, even though he certainly comes closer than the physical, astral and mental bodies to a condition of lesser subjectivity and, therefore, to a greater possibility of understanding a larger and more structured than what is Reality.
5- However, from there to having a correct understanding of the One, the step is still huge, and so is the presence of the other spiritual bodies in the end, it can only show the same problems and difficulties, while indicating an ever greater expansion of consciousness and, consequently, a greater possibility for the individual to come into contact with and understand new and wider portions of Reality of the One.
In fact, however large these portions of Reality are understood, they are always portions, so that the vision of the One ends up being, inevitably and once again, inexact and, however it may be, relative to the observer.
I don't know if I have been able to give you a correct idea of the scale and scope of the matter, but I hope so. What then are the conclusions that can be drawn on the problem of knowledge of the One by human beings, trying to use logic as an instrument?
The conclusion can only be one, namely that incarnate man does not have the possibility of truly knowing and understanding the One.
On the other hand, not even when disembodied does this possibility really exist, as the terms of the problem change in part but, in the end, the question always remains the same: a limited feeling, however broad it may be, cannot truly know or understand a Feeling Absolute, which is the only one with the possibility of knowing and understanding Himself.
I can understand that this is frustrating and that many of you think that then we might as well not talk about it at all and that, all in all, what I am saying is of no importance and uselessness since it is a problem with only one solution, moreover, it can only be implemented by the One itself.
I can agree with you, but only up to a certain point: in any case, the problem of knowledge and understanding of the One is part of the human being who, sooner or later, finds himself having to ask himself or face it and, therefore, it was our task as Instructors to provide you with all possible elements to examine it in the best way.
Furthermore, if it is true that it is not possible to understand and represent the One when one tries to observe it with the typical tools of those who are in relativity, it is equally true that it is possible, instead, to reason and understand in which ways the existence of the One affects relativity and what are the elements that characterize and indicate the presence of the Work of the One in the scenario in which the Many unravel their existences.
The main instrument, the diversifying element of Reality, which we had identified was the Vibration First, or that vibration which crosses matter carrying within itself the texture of the reality in the process of constitution of the Cosmos (a sort of cosmic genetic chain, we had suggested, to help you understand), departing from the One even before He puts into action that virtual fractionation of Himself which brings multiplicity into being (if we really wanted to give a temporal succession suitable for the understanding of the human being, we could say not only that the First Vibration is emitted "before" there is the virtual fractionation of the One but which, indeed, is itself the architect, the driving force).
From the First Vibration are born the Permanent Archetypes, constituting the main plot of the unfolding of the path of the Cosmos according to the Will of the One.
Well, it belongs to the First Vibration and to the archetypes that we will talk to you to give you the keys to that Paradise which man has always sought, with desire and hope, to find and which can only be identified in the One itself. Vito
We would like to translate this site into English with a neural translator: you want to make your little contribution?
With my mind I can understand the immensity of the sea and the universe, up to dizziness, then I stop.
The sea doesn't fit in the bucket but there is much more in the eye and mind than in a bucket.
Nonetheless, one always runs into the limit of perception. I don't know if one "feels" or "imagines" that there is much more, but perhaps instead of the "o" there is an "e": one hears and imagines...
Thank you.
Very important material, thank you!
Posts like these significantly reduce the human's claims to understanding, without however discouraging him from abandoning the search, in humility.