Moral models and the demands of feeling

D - I wanted to ask you: we pursue our own evolution but the responsibility di to be able to direct our choices in a certain way, which will in any case entail a series of repercussions, even negative ones, if we pursue our happiness, the achievement of certain ends, certain personal goals, how can we manage it?

Look, the responsibility for what you do, however it may be, is always yours in all cases; and in all cases keep in mind that what you do can have repercussions on others, so these repercussions are a problem for the other, perhaps that reacts to your actions and therefore has responsibilities in turn, however you are always responsible for triggering the situation. This happens anyway. This is not easily manageable.

The only way to manage your responsibilities in the best way always returns to being the same, that of knowing yourself and eliminating from your actions, as much as possible, the influences due to your Io, to your selfish desires; there is no other way.

D - Yes, of course. It is always returning to self-knowledge. Could this lead to a difficulty between choosing obedience and falling into resignation?

Obedience to what?

• Readings for the interior: every day a short spiritual reading of the Cerchio Ifior and the Cerchio Firenze 77, up Whatsapp and Telegram.
• Summary of the philosophical teaching of the Ifior Circle: HOW CONSCIOUSNESS CREATES PERSONAL REALITY, you can order here the book. If you're reading this and want support, write.

D - Obedience to certain instances of a moral nature that we have by now introjected and made our own.

But it does not seem to me that you have introjected so many instances of a moral nature, if I have to be honest. Certainly there are models that are presented to the individual from the very beginning, models due to the rules of society, models due to religious models, even - as those who follow the teaching know or perhaps begin to understand - even models coming from the upper floors, from the famous archetypes.

But all these models that you put inside yourselves, it is not that they have become yours, in reality: they have gone to combine with your needs for understanding, your evolutionary needs; so much so that, if you observe yourself well, you do nothing but go against these models that you possess. 

If… what do I know… the Christian religion had really put within you the models preached by Christ… you would all be saints! Instead none of you is a saint, none of you - if only he can - does not increase his patrimony for a moment in some way, perhaps not entirely lawful; if some of you, perhaps, see a beautiful girl or a handsome boy and - let's put it this way - "he tries" even knowing that it was not the time to do so, and so on; you do all these things anyway, beyond the hypothetical moral models you have inside.

This then means that these models that you introject, yes, exist within you as a hypothesis but, then, they collide with your realities, your needs; and therefore they have a very relative validity if not, in fact, as an example to refer to in order to have a comparison between what, in the end, what is right or unfair to you. 

And this is what will cause you the most problems when you leave the physical body, because you know that then there will be a certain period of time in which you will observe your life and, in the beginning, you will do so by judging yourself and your actions according to these first models that you have before you; and already there you will begin to suffer, because you will realize that these models, which perhaps ideally some, most of them, you considered right, you have trampled on them, you have not followed them, you have ignored them.

Here, then, that you will continue this analysis by examining the various models, examining things from the emotional point of view, from the emotional point of view, from the rational point of view, and so on, giving yourself an overall judgment on your life. And here it is hard!

You do not remember it, but it is undoubtedly a hard time for anyone who leaves the physical plane, however evolved he may be, because there are always and in any case things that one must understand. Even if it has evolved, by the very fact of being embodied, it means that it still has something to understand.

D - So we postpone the understanding of our choices and our renunciations until later.

No, no ... I need to clarify this thing or else it's not good. Postpone until after gaining understanding (the transcription of understanding in the Akasic body, ed), the discovery of understanding not understanding; I specify this because I would not like some people who perhaps attend the meetings very little to think that one understands after death; no: understanding always takes place alive and in any case. Unless there is a physical body existing within the physical plane it is not possible to gain understanding of experiences. Georgei

---