"Olz driv, ont sfrai, olz driv ain morai."
When I started to speak you heard me utter a sentence with sounds apparently meaningless, the sentence was: "Olz driv, ont sfrai, olz driv ain morai", which was the Atlantean analogue of "so high, so low. "
Now, of course, I have no intention of giving you a message in Atlantean also because, beyond curiosity, it could not provide you with many ideas for meditation; but presenting this sentence was a way to bring attention to language.
In fact, pulling the strings of what has been said up to this point, if everything is vibration, and if vibration is the basis ofevolution, also the different type of language must have its own function, precisely due to the fact that in the whole world that you know, human beings, animals and so on and on and on, do not have a common language.
It is obvious that this immediately indicates, without the need for many explanations and to go into abstruse theories, that language actually corresponds to the particular evolutionary needs of the individual who uses it.
Se io I asked you, one by one, if in your opinion language is the expression of the interiority of the individual who uses it, in 99% of cases I would be told that this is undoubtedly true. I don't want to be a nonconformist, as I usually do, and therefore I agree with this position.
However, it seems interesting to me to examine for a moment also the other side of the coin, that is wondering if it is possible that language is not only the expression of the interiority of the individual who uses it, but has had, or has, or will also have the function of acting on the interiority of the individual who uses it; or rather, to be even simpler: if not only the language, the type of language, is appropriate to the person, but also if the person is like that for using that kind of language.
Here, even in this case I can tell you immediately, without many twisting words, that there is undoubtedly an interaction between the type of language used and the interiority of the individual: without a doubt, therefore, language expresses what the individual feels. , but at the same time, it creates something within the individual, forming a kind of circle and impulses that vary not only within the individual but also within nations, countries, even races.
There is, therefore, with the passage of evolution, an adaptation of the type of language to the interiority of the individual, just as there is a mechanical adaptation, I would say, of the interiority of the individual to the type of language.
Think of the many kinds of languages that now exist on planet Earth and you will see that each language is in some way the mirror of the people who use it.
You are Italians and you know very well that you are considered, by peoples who use another language, a rather noisy people, rather open and on and on and on, and this undoubtedly corresponds to a quality typical of the majority of Italians; however, it is also a quality typical of the type of language that Italians use; in the same way think of the German and the conception that each of you has of the German people in general, and you will see this correspondence.
However, how is it that language can act on the individual? Certainly the word or the pronunciation of the word is not enough; remember what I said at the beginning, and think that, after all, the words of a language are the emission of vibrations, and that the vibration emitted not only has an action of some kind on the physical plane - at least that of reaching the hearing of those who can receive and hear it - but also propagates beyond the physical plane through the other planes: plane astral, mental, Akasic and on and on and on.
You know that the passage of a vibration through the planes in turn causes a kind of chain reaction on the other vibrations, which affect the matter of the planes that pass through it.
This causes the words spoken to somehow end up indirectly creating thought forms rudimentary, and then to create, with accessory vibrations, modifications in the bodies of people on other planes of existence.
You will know, no doubt, the importance that has been given in magic to the use of words: for example, the fact that, knowing the precise name of a demon, one could have the ability - through the pronunciation of this name - to imprison the demon, who, thanks to the strength and magic of the word - therefore to the sound, then to the vibration - remained a prisoner of those who did these practices with a certain knowledge of the facts.
In reality, this story of the demon prisoner of those who knew his name hides not a literal truth, but a symbolic truth on which, however, it does not seem appropriate - this evening - to entertain us.
The first objection that can come to mind, for what has been said up to this point, is that, in reality, a simple word, even if it is a vibration, cannot become so important as to induce transformations, changes in the individual. . And tonight, since I don't want to be unconventional as I said before, I agree with this objection.
«So - you will say - you have been talking all this time without concluding anything!».
Not at all, in fact we were just talking about a word, but when this word, this type of sound, this type of language is used continuously, daily, for years and for centuries by a people, clearly, that little vibration that for a single sound , for a single phoneme it could not have importance, in the long run it ends up instead assuming a considerable importance, because it invades the whole sphere of the individualities present in that nation, ending up by modifying both the astral matter and the the mental matter around that nation, thus affecting the bodies that are within this sphere; so here appear within a people that uses a specific language, a little at a time, the changes induced by the use of this language. Scifo
Readings for the interior: every day, a short spiritual reading of the Ifior Circle and of the Florence 77 Circle, on Whatsapp.
(Read only, cannot comment) To subscribe
Aphorisms of the Ifior Circle, on Wednesday on Facebook
Privacy policy of this site to consult before commenting, or subscribing to feeds.
Question I ask myself: a word of love creates a vibration, a word of hate creates another. Each of us knows how our bodies react to hearing a rebuke instead of a compliment.
This does not happen if the intention is the same but we do not grasp the meaning (beyond the bodily expression) of the same words spoken in a language we do not know. On a subtle level, those words of reproach or compliment pronounced in unknown languages produce an effect in us all the same or do we need an identity decoding for them to work on us?
Now I don't have a comment to leave, but a film to suggest on the importance of language in breaking down the walls of indifference. “All you want”, the story of a teenager and an elderly poet. Very delicate.
interesting and clear
We know that nothing is to chance and with these posts we delve into the complexity of the facts. I urge you not to take anything for granted.
I have a grandchild, who is learning different languages, the Italian of the father, the Danish of the mother and English which is the language that parents use to communicate. This condition is increasingly widespread. Can I imagine that there will be a choice that prevails and that will therefore have greater influence on the training, or simply the available data is greater, so it will be more complex?
Interesting!
The post is very interesting for what it says about language and the questions posed by Roberto and Natascia seem to me to be centered too. with regard to the film suggested by Mariella, let's think about how poems change our inner self.