In moments when one feels that he needs space, that he needs time for himself, that he must realize himself, that he is impatient because he feels this urge to do something different for himself ... Zifed
You see, my dear, usually when there are these inner situations (that is, not usually, we say "always"), it is because the individual he feels the lack of something.
Now, what is good to understand is that every time the individual feels the lack of something and its "IoWhich warns her, always; and everything that the individual creates on it: "I need time, I need space, I need solitude" and on and on and on, they are always excuses to justify what one will do or what one maybe he would like to do and then he won't do; a little putting your hands forward to justify yourself.
I say: "If the individual wants to find time for himself there is no one who can take it away!". The space for itself always exists, and in any case it has it inside, it is such a huge space that it would never be able to fill it anyway even if it got a good buzz!
- Readings for the interior: every day a short spiritual reading of the Cerchio Ifior and the Cerchio Firenze 77, up Whatsapp and Telegram.
- Summary of the philosophical teaching of the Ifior Circle: HOW CONSCIOUSNESS CREATES PERSONAL REALITY, you can order here the book. If you're reading this and want support, write.
If one wants to have time to think about himself, then to try to understand himself, he can do it at any time, no one can rob him of that possibility.
He puts a fork and thinks about a mistake he made, puts a spoon and thinks how else he could act, puts a knife and chooses one of the many ways he thought of, puts a spoon and finally found a possibility he hadn't thought of .
This did not distract him from what he had to do, it did not allow anyone to take away space, he was not denied any inner freedom, he did not take anything away from anyone, on the contrary he gave something to himself.
D - But this person put the fork, the spoon, the knife while he was thinking and, therefore, he put them in the wrong way!
Well, it will mean that, in order to put them back in the right way, he will have time to think again!
And then, to those among you - and even those who are not among you - who say and think: «I am a type led to spirituality; I, my God, need to meditate, I need to be meditative in order to advance in mine evolution», To him, whoever he is, I can only answer:« Dear son, the only true meditation that exists is your life! Live it and you will have meditated just enough to understand what you need, now and always; and this is valid for anyone! ». Creatures, serenity to you! Scifo
That's what I've always felt….
That's it….
Of course, meditation is pure free '...
I think that time for oneself can be understood not only as the satisfaction of an ego need, but as a pause between two actions, which in my opinion is as indispensable as the pause between inhale and exhale.
As for meditation, I can transform life into meditation only if I know what it means to meditate, that is to say if I get a time / pause to sit in silence during the day.
Speaking of thinking about some mistake made or something else, while doing an action, putting a fork, as in the example, means not being in the thing you do, but being somewhere else, with the mind. I thought they shouldn't be.
This post leaves me some doubts and I would like to expose only a few so as not to dwell too much.
"What is good to understand is that every time the individual feels the lack of something it is his" I "that feels it, always and in any case"
I can agree that it is the ego that feels the sense of lack, but it seems to me that behind what is perceived as a sense of lack there is a push of the conscience.
Consciousness is in turn stimulated by the higher planes and what on the level of identity is decoded as a lack seems to me that in a more or less conscious way it may be the yearning for inner unification. Hence the need to take time, to leave room for meditation. I cannot see this as a pretext to justify one's doing or not doing, this can happen but not always and inevitably.
Another sentence that leaves me perplexed:
“Dear son, the only true meditation that exists is your life! Live it and you will have meditated just enough to understand what you need, now and forever. "
It seems sacrosanct to me, but the problem is that up to a certain point in the journey of individuality, living is a mechanical act, largely subject to emotional and mental conditioning, certainly not a meditative act. Learning occurs of necessity through the suffering inflicted by the repercussions caused by unconscious acting.
Meditation as a practice enters the life of the individual when he feels the strong urge to get out of this mechanicalness and live consciously. When, at an evolved stage of the journey, life is constantly lived in a meditative state, then the practice has exhausted its role.
Useful for me to read the comments on the post.
I realize that I struggle to question what the guides say.
But the perplexities of some, I further clarify the concepts.
thank you
The interpretation of this post is that we want to emphasize the importance of asking questions, of questioning ourselves in the face of the facts that happen. This is the start of the inner dialogue.
Awareness and presence are successive conditions.