D – We have the possibility to say: «Io I'm not going out today" so I prevent myself from having experiences...
Certainly.
D – And, therefore, should we go out every night?!
It's not for sure. You should do what you feel.
D – Eh, but you feel the fear of missing out on opportunities!
That is not "feel», that is Me.
D – So what you hear could be: «I would gladly stay at home»?
Is it what you feel or is it the ego?
This is where we come back to what I was saying before: you can't do anything but try to understand it; and try to understand this, not with your mind but with your conscience.
And to understand with your conscience you don't have to elucubrate theories after theories (even if this can clearly help, obviously; because if you have the mental body, it's right that you use it) however, more than anything else, you need your akasic body can observe your reactions and, therefore, understand.
'listen to the akashic'
D - Yes, however, where is it that we have to listen to the akashic?
But you can't hear it! The vibration sent by the akasic body is too rarefied for you, with your brain and with your mind, to truly succeed in understanding; you can understand that there is something going through you that goes beyond your transitory bodies, yes; however being able to specify what comes from the akasic body is very, very difficult, it is something that happens spontaneously, it is something that makes you act in such a way that you don't even realize you have acted, because it is something "felt".
D – That is, does it come out of your instinct?
Let's say it's a sort of instinct; with the difference that, being truly spontaneous, internalized and part of you, aware and understood by your akasic body, you will do it without even realizing it.
D - Yes, however, when it's complete then you do it without realizing it, but when it's still polluted by the mind, I think there's some little spark that moves...
But there is nothing you can do!
D – So why do you say «listen to each other»?
Because if you listen to each other, certainly you will allow the data that you are experiencing to arrive at your conscience in a better way.
D - Yes, but you just said now that we struggle, because our mind begins to process and creates a great mess.
Certainly; but it is not your mind that listens, is your akasic body. When we tell you «watch», we create a channel between your akasic body and your lower bodies – a «preferred channel», as I said before – and, in reality, the real observation is made by the akasic body, not by you.
- Readings for the interior: every day a short spiritual reading of the Cerchio Ifior and the Cerchio Firenze 77, up Whatsapp and Telegram.
- Summary of the philosophical teaching of the Ifior Circle: HOW CONSCIOUSNESS CREATES PERSONAL REALITY, you can order here the book. If you're reading this and want support, write.
Q – How do I make it flow? Putting myself still, calm…
Letting what flows through you flow as much as possible, therefore trying to to accept yourselves, not going to seek complicated elements; just try to be yourself as much as possible; what you think, believe, feel, feel that you are yourself. The moment you act altruistic when you know you are selfish, at that moment you are not helping the Akashic body! You would help him much more if you were selfish by realizing that you are selfish!
D – Scifo, there are those moments that sudden resolutions occur in us of some things that maybe we didn't even suspect at that moment, to which a sense of integrity is associated, of total well-being, of total satisfaction, well, that's what could you say it is akashic body wave?
It could be a consequence of an understanding about the akasic body, sure.
D – And, therefore, a way to warn it could be precisely in those moments there, in which we warn it.
It could be so; however – I repeat – “could”; there might even be a more down to earth cause than a I satisfied for something he managed to get, for example.
D – But, in this life, what can a person find out about sé? What is a person made that way, with those characteristics, at what moment then?
No, maybe we don't understand each other on terminology here. The "about us» can refer to the incarnate person, therefore to the transitory bodies, which change from time to time, therefore you can know for that life what the reactions of these transitory bodies are, but in the next life you will certainly not know if they will be the same, indeed: not they will certainly be the same; and then there is instead the «who are you» referring to your akasic body, which instead is constant for all lives. That's where the ′′ what you really are ′′ starts from the understandings that are on your akasic.
D – But the awareness of who we are however in the akasic we don't have it here, as embodied. It is not possible. We can only know about our misunderstandings, however, who we really are is not possible.
It's not possible isn't it. Let's say that it is possible to recognize - or at least think of having recognized - from one's own behavior and from the analysis of what one does in the course of life, or from the elaboration of what the reactions have been in the course of experiences, one can come to think that you have understood what you have really understood, or what you have not really understood. If you were faced with a situation in which you are in doubt whether or not to kill a person, in that moment you can understand if your akasic body has understood that you must not kill yourself.
D – Ah, yes; let's say that however I have the idea of that understanding there, but not of all.
Certainly. You can get a glimpse of some parts of your understanding; that glimmer that on the other hand it is possible for you to recover through the bodies that you currently have at your disposal; because remember, we always said: never express allevolution you have. We have told you this – if you remember – as a stimulus to remind you that you are better than you seem in these lifetimes.
So, don't get too downhearted because you're a little bit better anyway. In this life, with the transitory bodies you have, you can express, let flow only a certain part of what you have already understood, not "all" of what you have understood.
[...] D – It almost seems that, in a lifetime, we are not allowed to really know who we are, but simply to see the movement, observe the reactions and transmit the data to the akasic, and then he will.
In my opinion, it's not that it's not allowed; is that the chances you have of understanding the already arranged innermost parts of yourself are such that, when they come to light through the lower bodies, they cloak themselves in the thrusts of the ego and therefore it becomes difficult to recognize them.
Q – When you say «already fixed» do you mean complete understandings of all the nuances?
Most of the nuances. The "feeling" is formed when all the nuances come together and become a single matter; therefore, in reality, there is never an element that can be understood by itself in all its nuances. To be truly understood, one element, all of consciousness must be understood.
“The who we are refers to the bodies of the wounded, the” who you are “to the body of conscience.”
I had never grasped this distinction.
It helps to know that overall we have more understandings in the akashic than we show in this lifetime.
That's why we can never say about each other's behavior.
In light of what is written here The "know yourself" could be declined in a "listen to yourself". Experience already known by Socrates, proponent of "know thyself", who claimed to listen to his "demon" who showed him how to act.