D - Georgei, sorry, tooio I wanted to ask you a question that is being asked to me by several people I am in contact with. You know that similarities are often drawn between the Florence Circle and the Ifior Circle ...
Alas, yes I know!
D – Well, so please: I don't know what to answer when they tell me: «Okay, let's admit they aren't a continuation or the same Guides, but how come the same characters, that is, one French, one Oriental, one Kempis/ Scifo let's say; is what should i say? How come there is this similarity of characters?
There is a fairly simple explanation: first of all why it is necessary to present a sample of personality - including a certain exoticism, in some cases, as in my case - and the choice is not that it is very vast; you need to introduce characters who are somewhat familiar enough to the people who participate.
Of course we could bring ... I don't know ... a Maori; but a Maori, after all, you wouldn't feel very close, in the end, would you? This is what concerns, let's say, the accents we use, which are those - alas, unfortunately - of some lives of us who present themselves.
As for the main Guides, however, the speech is different: they present themselves with those characters because they are linked in some way to the discourse of the archetypes.
And here we complicate life but, since you've faced it, we need to explain it for a moment, right? If I asked you: "Among the Guides, who is it that communicates more sweetness to you?", I am convinced that the majority of you would answer either "Moti" or "Viola", right?
But, then, ask yourself for a moment: Moti shows up, with that personality and that way of speaking, and Viola with that personality and that way of speaking to communicate sweetness to you, or it's your idea of sweetness that somehow made it necessary for "those" Entities with "that type" of personality to present themselves?
The same goes, of course, with Scifo. The characters and types of personalities that can be used in encounters are ultimately very few; there is not a huge variety; the details may vary, but the qualities for teaching, for sweetness or for the affective encounter and so on are quite stereotyped. Here, then, that there is necessarily a certain homologation of characters for Circles that have the same type of teaching.
- Readings for the interior: every day a short spiritual reading of the Cerchio Ifior and the Cerchio Firenze 77, up Whatsapp and Telegram.
- Summary of the philosophical teaching of the Ifior Circle: HOW CONSCIOUSNESS CREATES PERSONAL REALITY, you can order here the book. If you're reading this and want support, write.
D - Sure, thank you. So, for example Hiawatha, an Indian, it is not that he has a particular typology that transmits something to us.
Exactly. It is already more difficult for you to be able to understand, to receive something from an individual - and here we are talking about individuals, not just disembodied entities - who belongs to a culture other than yours. It can communicate an emotion, a feeling, but understanding it in depth becomes more difficult, clearly. And tell these people, for example, that there has never been a Hiawatha in Florence ...
D - I would like to know what substantial difference there is between your thought and the thought of theosophical movement.
At the level of actual teaching I would say that there is not much difference; the cornerstones of the theosophical teaching are the same as those of our teaching - and then, on the other hand, also of all the teachings, in the end - which are: the necessity ofevolution, the law of karma, the law of reincarnation, and so on.
These are key elements that then belong to all spiritual doctrines, even to those that may be less known to you. The one on which, instead, we disagree enough is all that part of the theosophical doctrine, which on the other hand is not even very well known, nor is it much promoted by Theosophy itself, which concerns the paranormal phenomenology (let's say so) acquired through the supposed evolution of Blavatsky or of besant or Olcott, with all that mixture of dreams and illusions that then spoke of other worlds, other realities, astral travel and so on.
Here, for all that part we do not say that they are not possible, that those kinds of things do not happen, however, in our opinion, a large part of that whole section of theosophical doctrine, as far as the actual theosophical doctrine is concerned, is very stuffed with the desires, emotions and sensations of those who experienced that kind of thing; therefore to be taken a lot with the pliers and not to be carried away a lot, perhaps to try to obtain the same results.
D - Maybe it's more suited to an Eastern mentality than a Western one, right?
I would say that the intention, if I am not mistaken, was precisely that of being able to westernize what good came from ancient wisdom coming, in particular, from the East; and not only from the East, on the other hand.
In part the attempt was successful, in part it failed; what is certain is that, if you look and read carefully everything that happens to you, or that you see on television or in the movies, you will realize that the teaching - even if not openly - has actually reached your ears and within the reach of all those who manage to understand it.
Everywhere there is the concept of reincarnation, everywhere there is the concept of evolution, after-death and so on; the whole part of the teaching of evolution is now brought to the consciousness of almost all humanity; and this is part of that «general initiation plan"That was once talked about, so that certain truths that were once made known only to a few people, because they could cause imbalances to those who were not ready to accept them, can now be carried in a broader way to prepare the way, then , to other different, higher, more complete and more complex cognitions that will be faced with the passage of time.
You don't have to believe that because the Great Masters stopped at a certain point, the Truth is all there. The Truth goes beyond what has been said and, from time to time, according to the needs of the evolutionary path of man, new truths are presented, perhaps modified or expanded to ensure that the teaching can continue to move forward serving as a stimulus for humanity; because always remember that the ultimate goal is to make each individual advance, to make him evolve, to make him abandon the wheel of births and deaths, also to prepare the environment for the other waves of life that follow one another incessantly. Georgei
Interesting, thanks.
Very clear.
Very interesting
Thank you.