D - We must grasp the nuances of what you say, of the teaching. If an individual believes he has understood the nuances, how can he confirm it later? That is, I mean, with you it is not that you can have a dialogue as between incarnated people, clearly, however, how can you then be sure that you have understood right?
Here the speech is simply the same that has always been said about understanding: you will know the moment you understand, because the experience, the kind of experience that was supposed to teach you that certain thing, will never show up again.
We have talked about nuances, but nuance actually involves an experience; let's say it's an extension of an experience, a go deeper into the experience to understand something that otherwise would have remained latent, yet to be understood. Within the same experience there are so many possibilities of understanding, so many possible nuances to be able to deepen.
When you understand, this experience - if it occurs again - will be much simpler, much more reduced in its terms because you will have already understood some nuances.
As you understand the nuances, the experience will diminish in presenting itself to you and here, then, at that point, you will fully understand and that experience will no longer fully present itself.
D - But, I mean, if an individual has disharmonious bodies, let's say, clearly it will be more difficult for him to understand, compared to another who has all the uniformed bodies.
Ma io I would say that you have a misunderstanding behind this discourse, because you have disharmonious bodies precisely because you have not understood.
The harmony of the various bodies takes place through understanding, through the structuring of the Akasic, therefore of yours feel. As your Akasic is structured more and more completely and your feeling expands, your lower bodies will also be more and more harmonious with each other.
Readings for the interior: every day, a short spiritual reading of the Ifior Circle and of the Florence 77 Circle, on Whatsapp.
(Read only, cannot comment) To subscribe
D - Yes, but even those who have harmonic bodies, those who have already reached a certain feeling, it is clear that they too must still understand something.
Certainly certainly.
Q - This is what I meant, that it will be easier for this individual to be able to live.
I wouldn't agree with that much. If you look at all the lives, the biographies of the great initiates assuming that they were really all great initiates, which many times is not true, but let's forget this, we don't care ... if you look, I said, the biographies of all these great initiated you will see that none of them have had a good life, a quiet, happy and satisfying life, but it has always been a life almost earthquake, I would say, with always big problems, big diseases, big emotional turbulence and so on.
This because? According to your reasoning, then, they should have instead had a very peaceful life in which they could safely let their feelings flow and live what they understood peacefully! How come that's not the case then?
D - Of course, that's not the case because they had all the karma from past lives, I guess.
Well, it's not that simple. Get to a good point of evolution, to a great feel, it means to have a large increase in sensitivity, and this increase in sensitivity means to experience for a nuance the same suffering that one would have felt for a very large, very large factor of understanding. Georgei
Privacy policy of this site to consult before commenting,
or subscribe to feeds.
Having a greater awareness of one's path and a certain evolution does not mean not feeling pain. Yes, think of Christ and you will understand how far from reality the equation “to be evolved = to be blessed” is.
The path of awareness is fatigue: it increases the sensitivity and proportionally the possibility of exposure to pain.
Thank you.
Chiaro
Thanks Georgei, what you say is very useful.
If it is true that greater evolution corresponds to greater sensitivity, therefore greater exposure to pain, it is also true that greater evolution means greater ability to sustain that pain, to give it meaning.
With each evolution its suffering
I want to think that an increase in sensitivity, in a more evolved feeling, is edifying for the less evolved feelings.
Anyone who undertakes the inner journey knows the restlessness that moves him. Therefore, the idea of tranquility and bliss is far from it.
The formula is not: more evolution, more happiness.
I agree with saying that greater evolution allows for a different processing of pain.
The greater the faith, the greater the support.