Telepathy: communication between mental bodies [IF56-3focus]

Listening to your discussions it seems to me that I have identified a misunderstanding of the words of the teaching or, at least, an imperfect understanding of what is the relationship between the mental body of the individual and his living being within the physical plane.

Let's see if I can summarize one of the clichés to which you are strongly attached and from which I want to try to make you depart a little.
You say, "The organ that manifests the mental body is the brain."
Well, my brothers, that's not exactly the case: as usual, the Truth is wider than the human mind can usually imagine, even in its moments of wildest inventiveness!

To make you understand where I want to go I must, unfortunately, go back for a moment to concepts now left behind but necessary to bring you to understand.

• Readings for the interior: every day a short spiritual reading of the Cerchio Ifior and the Cerchio Firenze 77, up Whatsapp and Telegram.
• Summary of the philosophical teaching of the Ifior Circle: HOW CONSCIOUSNESS CREATES PERSONAL REALITY, you can order here the book. If you're reading this and want support, write.

We had often said that the materials of the various bodies of the individual are not (as it may appear at first sight due to the cataloging used to provide you with the notions of the planes of existence) one above the other but, more rightly, they they interpenetrate, so that delimiting any portion of the body of the embodied being, not only a portion of the physical body is identified but also a portion of the astral body and one of the mental body.

This means that an experience that affects a certain portion of the physical body simultaneously affects a portion of the astral body and one portion of the mental body.

To give a practical example: you are picking roses from your garden when one of its thorns pricks your finger.
What can be assumed to happen to your lower bodies in conjunction with the prick of that thorn?

As a consequence of the laceration of the skin of your finger there will be a reaction from your physical body, a reaction that will lead, for example, to the leakage of blood or the redness of the wounded part.

At the same time the thorn will have caused a sensation of pain in your finger and this sensation of pain is transformed, inside your astral body, into an emotion: you want a simple emotion in response to the physical sensation of pain immediately you want, to provide you with a for example, the anger at not being careful enough to pick the rose.

Your angry reaction reaches your mental body which, pruning it from the perceived emotions, analyzes it and deduces from that experience the logical consequences that it can draw from that small accident, for example the need to pay more attention to one's actions.

What I want to emphasize is that all this work can take place completely outside your brain: the mental matter connected to the injured finger brings the results of that experience to the mental body without necessarily going through the brain.

I think that you will not completely agree with my words or, at least, that you will have strong doubts: perhaps, you will object, the pain felt does not pass through the brain?
I can only agree with you on this point, however things are not quite as you think.

First of all I would like to remind you that the organ that you define the brain is a set of physical matter to which, as I said a little earlier, both a portion of astral matter and a portion of mental matter are connected.

If we agree (and I think so) that each matter interacts with the others in the individual's bodies, then we must come to the conclusion that the brain is also directly subjected to the influences of the physical body and those of the astral body, and not only to those of the mental body.

So much so that a strong physical trauma can cause, for example, a total amnesia, just as a strong emotion can affect the language centers located in the brain causing a sudden stutter or an inability to offer anything.

So, in what sense has it been said in the past that the brain is the central unit of the mental body?

In the sense that the brain is made up in such a way as to collect most of the data coming from the sensations and emotions that come from the experience on the physical plane (attention: only most, however, and later I will explain what is left out) by gathering them in a compact way to facilitate its reception by the mental body which, in response, through the brain itself, will make the adjustments it deems necessary (both to astral and physical matter) based on the data received.

In other words, if there was no mental body to supervise the brain, our finger prick could result in, for example, a much longer gushing of blood than actually happens, because the body's automatic defenses physical would not guarantee the almost immediate activation of the physical work that allows to accelerate the process of stopping the blood.

In the same way the pain felt would be more lasting over time, consequently the emotion of the astral body more intense and prolonged with the obvious consequences that this could bring.

Here, then, that the brain can undoubtedly also be seen as the organ to which the mental body is connected but, mainly, should be imagined as the organ used by the mental body to branch out into the astral body and into the physical body the directives that come from it.

I had previously stated that the brain collects the results of most of the perceptions, sensations and emotions that come from the experience made on the physical plane, thus suggesting that there is a part of these perceptions, sensations and emotions that may not reach the brain.

So it is, in fact: there is a great deal of small sensations and perceptions physical, as well as astral emotions, which we can define localized in a certain physical or astral area, which quickly lose their disturbance value, so that the reactions they cause do not reach the brain but are in some way managed and arranged, I would almost say automatically, from that portion of the mental body connected to the parts in question.

That is, it happens that certain portions of matter in the mental body, without passing through the ebb and flow between the brain and the mental body, implement and assist the natural laws which, spontaneously, tend to bring all the matter of all the planes back to a condition of stability and balance.

It is clear, for example, that a small and negligible cutaneous boil is not helped to resolve itself directly by the brain or by the mental body as a whole, but by the part of matter of the mental body connected to it, which will locally activate that activity. biological and physiological which will gradually lead to the healing of the boil in question.

What I wanted to make you understand with these arguments of mine, was that the brain, in itself, is not autonomous except to the extent that it enacts the laws of nature within the physical body, and even in this case it is in any case forced to channel and move along the tracks that natural laws have made available to him. 

I also wanted to make you realize that the mental body affects every individual even beyond his brain ... if this were not the case, for example, the long years of life of the brain-injured would not make sense, and their existence could only seem a evident proof of the nonexistence of God or, at least, of his indifference - if not hostility - towards the human being.

Over the years, the Guides have taken away from this organ of the human body much of its importance (although they certainly cannot deny its absolute necessity and irreplacability) by asserting, for example, that the common conception that our brain thinks is wrong and that, in reality, the thinker is the mental body, so that the brain must necessarily be identified more as the organ of the physical body which reflects on the physical plane the thoughts emitted by the mental body than as the main representative of the individual same.

In my turn io I would like to take away from the brain another hypothetical function that the mythology of the paranormal attributes to it: that of being the organ that telepathically transmits.

Telepathy it occurs not from brain to brain as is usually believed, but from mental body to mental body, through the energies and materials of the mental plane. In telepathic communications, therefore, nothing can be found that can be measured with the aid of physical instrumentation, and this gives reason to the detractors of the paranormal who claim that they have not encountered particular cerebral emissions that could justify a passage of telepathic information from one individual to another.

Of course this does not prove that they are right, but simply that they - with the presumption and lack of humility that often accompanies science - assume and theorize on the basis of highly deficient information which, as such, does not allow them an adequate view of reality, at least for the topic in question.

For my part, the question arises spontaneously: is it really so important and essential to prove the existence of telepathy or to demonstrate its non-existence?

 There are undoubtedly other things far more important and essential (moreover already much more than tried) to which to devote one's energies. There is evidence of millions of people who have nothing to eat or who die on the streets during the winter because they have no home to live in.

But, unfortunately, it is typical of a certain category of human beings to worry more about proving the existence or non-existence of telepathy than, perhaps, about making their children grow up in a healthy way - internally and externally -. Andrea

---