The transformation of the physical environment functional to incarnation [IF49-2focus]

The topic at a glance
To get a race to evolve it is necessary that, from its first incarnation, it finds the right physical environment; this physical environment needs to be transformed to adapt to the changing evolutionary needs of individuals.

[…] Let's go back to our four starting environments; let's take a moment to see the physical environment: what have we seen in recent times? 

  • We have seen that to get a race to evolve it is necessary that the race, from its first incarnation, find the right physical environment to be able to incarnate.
  • We also saw that this physical environment needs to transform to adapt to the changing evolutionary needs of individuals.
  • We have seen how the vibration first, which initiates the departure of a cosmos is at the basis of the formation of matter on the physical plane, already giving those elements such that there is a solid basis on which the physical environment can be built in certain directions rather than in others; that is, in directions that are useful to the race to be incarnated; therefore in such a way that the matter of the physical plane has in turn aevolution, a change, a change that gradually leads it to be in a position to offer what is needed for the evolution of the race. 

Now, I have heard one of you, this very evening, speak of a point that usually those who deny the speeches that are made here or elsewhere often quote: "If, as you say, - that is us - this is the third race that is incarnated, if each race is incarnated for about 50.000 years and the races overlap, this means, in a nutshell, that the human being on the planet has only been present for approximately 140.000 years. Right? Forgive me for the change!

  • Readings for the interior: every day a short spiritual reading of the Cerchio Ifior and the Cerchio Firenze 77, up Whatsapp and Telegram.
  • Summary of the philosophical teaching of the Ifior Circle: HOW CONSCIOUSNESS CREATES PERSONAL REALITY, you can order here the book. If you're reading this and want support, write.

But then, those artifacts found more than once of dating humans - I know io - three hundred thousand, five hundred thousand, one million years ago (and here the datings are wasted, again for the accuracy and repeatability of science!) What sense do they have? The accounts don't add up, so what you are saying is nothing but bullshit ». All in all, if I were one of them, I would think like them. You no? No? Well then, since you said "we don't," then explain why!

D – I also explained it in this sense, and it is that in order to have a human incarnation one must have a suitable environment to welcome it and, as an environment, above all also a physical vehicle made on purpose to be able to allow evolution; and therefore there was (according to science) a very long phase of preparation of the vehicles suitable for a human incarnation, which are those hominids who are finding scientists everywhere and, if the calculations are not completely wrong, we get up to three million and a half years, etc. It just means that the preparation phase of the suitable vehicle for human incarnation has been quite long.

In my opinion, the important point that should be emphasized is: were those creatures human beings or not?

D - At this point they could not be, because we have also seen that there are group-souls, therefore the incarnations in the vegetables, in the animals, therefore the incarnation was already there. They couldn't be human beings.

We play the part of Piero Angela: "It seems to me, Scifo, that a wealth of artifacts was found next to these finds, which means that they were able to manipulate objects, to build, to create, therefore they had all the attributes that even an actual human being possesses, beyond the different civilization; so let's go back to the nonsense I was talking about at the beginning ».

"It seems to me, dear Mr. Angela, that beavers build dams, it seems to me that there are monkeys that weave some kind of huts going to look for branches of a particular tree - not of others - which is the most resistant, the most suitable for that kind of work. Were they men? Maybe you and those monkeys are on the same level? It could be! According to your "scientific" reasoning, no doubt you and that monkey are ... I don't mean father and son but brother and brother! "

D - In my opinion, to solve the problem we must think that when the Akasic reaches a certain evolutionary level and decides - if we can say so - to initiate a process of transformation of a certain individual and to gradually transform him into man , from that moment onwards Akasic comes into play and therefore we can speak of a human being.

Here, this is it the difference between human and animal; not the fact of being able to manipulate, or use or choose to use certain objects, but the fact of doing it with a certain awareness of what you are doing; therefore the fact of having an inner intention, not for example instinctual only, to do so; hence the fact that - as our disciple F. said - the Akasic's intervention in the individual comes into play. 

Those archaeological finds, in fact, they are none other than evolution passages of matter and form within the physical environment for to prepare that physical body best suited to the immersion in it of the complete human being in all its components, that is: physical body suitable for expressing evolution; feelings, emotions and desires to try to build something for oneself and for others; thought to govern the physical body, sensations, emotions, desires and at the same time to create something different; and finally conscience, to give a motivation, an intention and a justification to the existence of the other components; because - remember it, creatures - that, however it may be, the individual is a unique whole, and not only with himself, as you well know, but with all the reality in which he is immersed.

D - These hominids we were talking about, among which it seems to me there is "l'homo abilis" - but I am absolutely not well versed in the matter - which is beginning to use his hands: did they have a distinct Akasic body, or were they connected as a group soul to the Akasic mass?

No, they were animals and therefore they had asoul-group. Who knows why they didn't do the "beaver abilis"!

Well, it seems to me that the physical environment is quite clear: its necessity is clear, it is clear how it transforms and adjusts through the evolution of matter and also of form in such a way that it is available in the right way for the breed. which is incarnated, and it is also clear how the process becomes even more complicated for the physical environment, when the incarnate race is able to interact with the environment since at that point the race itself becomes a factor of environmental evolution; the race itself interacts with the environment, modifies it and causes - without being aware of it - to help provide an environment suitable for the evolutionary needs of the individuals who will later incarnate. Scifo


Print Friendly, PDF & Email

3 comments on “The transformation of the physical environment functional to incarnation [IF49-2focus]”

  1. So while we are rightly concerned with how we are disfiguring the physical environment, which is our home as embodied, this devastation will be functional to the evolution of new individuals.

    Reply

Leave a comment