The dysfunctions of the ego, the personality, the cycle of data between bodies

D - I wanted to ask you: when there are psychic dissociations and theIo maybe it is not well settled with itself, that is, it has dysfunctions, in this case how does the akasic interfere with this ego? How does understanding come about for these issues?

Understanding always occurs through the stimuli that the Akasic, however, receives from what happens in daily experience in the physical world. The fact that there are psychological and psychiatric problems with regard to the formation of an ego as understood by psychology does not change anything; however experience brings understanding, knowledge that eventually broadens the understanding of the Akasic body.

Let's say that even the craziest person in the world, the most autistic, the most closed in on itself, the most withdrawn in itself and therefore the one apparently most incapable of having experiences, in reality - even in those conditions so desperate for the observer and so difficult to understand and accept - in fact he is bringing data to the understanding of his Akasic body.

D - But maybe it takes longer than another individual, maybe.

But, you know, for the Akasic body it's not a matter of time. Time is lived in a dramatic way by you, who have the impression that it slips out of your hands because in a hundred years you leave your physical body… at best, of course.
However, as far as the Akasic body is concerned, he is not interested in understanding what your day or year is; the important thing is to continue to broaden the understanding; the timing of this enlargement does not matter at all.

D - I was thinking about the distinction between I and personality: personality is all that complex that belongs to the individual?

The distinction is very simple. The ego it is the reflection mainly - we have always said "mainly" and this is important - of what are the non-understandings of the Akasic body; the personality instead it manifests the whole set of factors, of the elements that contributed to constituting that incarnation and therefore also the understandings of the Akasic body; therefore we say that, from a certain point of view, it can be a much enlarged ego in all its components, much less limited, much more stable - in the end - than what the ego can be.

D - Even more altruistic, then, from this point of view?

Certainly.

Q - So childhood traumas are part of this personality development, which is needed to gain a new understanding?

I would say that i childhood trauma, being the consequence - as they always are - of causes of previous lives and therefore of the need for understanding, they are more than anything else factors that influence the ego and only apparently on the personality; precisely because we tend to confuse these two terms "I" and "personality".

In reality, the personality is always something better than what the ego is, however it may be, which in turn, however, has a certain preponderance in the course of normal life as reacts to all stimuli immediately and therefore it tends to supplant what would be the individual's true reaction with the basis he possesses.

D - Perhaps because the engine of the Ego is precisely the mind, it is the one to which the bodies under the mind, that is astral and physical, also lead?

And here's another one of those things that you haven't framed very well. Ah, the mind! You speak of the mind as if it were a thing a standing! I understand that you are used to making schematizations, to work by categories and therefore, many times, trying to follow what we say makes you amazed (especially when it is hot like this evening), but you cannot consider the mind as a stand-alone one: the mind is part of a cycle!
Remember we said once that everything about the individual, about reality is regulated by cycles, right? 

The mind - let's say the mental body, to make you understand, otherwise we make you go "out of mind" - the mental body is not independent, but interacts with the astral body; the astral body is not independent but interacts with the mental body and with the physical body, exchanging vibrations between them which create a circle that goes from the lower mental body to the astral body and the physical body. Once in the physical body, there is still the vibration that comes back, which creates a circle that goes from the physical body to the astral body, from the astral body to the mental body, is then acquired in some way by the higher mental body - and it is this. which causes you to go a little astray - which, under the impulses coming from the Akasic body, restarts the energies by making them pass through the lower mental body, astral body, physical body and on and on and on, continuing this circle. 

Now, in this sense the mind can be considered the creator of the ego, as the upper part of the mental body is the one that sets these in motion cyclic energies, circulatory, which lead to the reaction of the three lower bodies towards physical reality and therefore to their clash with reality and, as a consequence, to the birth of that illusion which is the ego. It's clear?

D - The highest part of the mental body because it is the one that most directly ...

It is closer to the vibrations of the Akasic body. This is because I also felt that, by going to retrieve words spoken in other places, there was the risk of confusing your ideas and making others look bad; so it was better to clarify this concept right away. Scifo


Print Friendly, PDF & Email

12 comments on “Ego dysfunctions, personality, the data cycle between bodies”

  1. Therefore, the ego would be the not understood, the unordered of the Akasic body, more precisely its reflection. I thought that the ego was the total mirror of consciousness, in truth it is not. Thanks for the clarification.

    Reply
  2. All very complex, especially if you do not have a basis in psychology, so like me that I struggle to understand the steps, what can it be used for in everyday life? Perhaps trying to explain it in an elementary way would have been more helpful to me, so instead it makes me feel very ignorant.

    Reply
  3. The observation of the distinction between ego and personality is very interesting,
    it clears up many misunderstandings.

    Reply
  4. x Stephen

    What is presented in the post and in the table is the compendium of all the philosophical teaching brought by the Guides in recent decades. It is undoubtedly complex and difficult to understand if you do not know everything that has been said about it, so you should not feel ignorant or inadequate in the face of such a complex synthesis.
    What is it for in everyday life? At least to help the understanding of a much more interconnected and complicated Reality than we usually consider it. And this leads to a vision of reality that can provide many elements of help to understand and interact with what is lived in everyday life,
    Of course, knowing the planes of existence or the bodies of the individual and so on, as the Guides have always said, is not indispensable and the path of the individual goes on anyway even without knowing the philosophical teaching but I believe he, in any case, acquire a different perspective in observing the facts of life can contribute to living it in a more useful and conscious way.
    In the same way, one might ask what is the point of reasoning about God ...

    Reply
  5. The scheme of the bodies and subplanes is not at all clear to me, I do not understand why two sections with the same wording but with different contents.

    Speaking of psychic and mental alterations, what about those many people whose minds become clouded in old age, sometimes to the point of dementia? Theirs would seem an involution ...
    Thank you.

    Reply
    • Can you specify better what part you don't understand?
      As regards the psychic and mental alterations in relation to the evolution of the individual, it must be remembered that it is not the transitory bodies that evolve, but the set of understandings that are inscribed in the body of consciousness (and also in the cases you cite, the experience that the individual goes through, however, provides elements of understanding to the body of consciousness which, therefore, evolves and does not involve).
      I hope I was ask, if not ask again.

      Reply
      • In this table there are two columns, above the second it says permanent ... why this second column? I did not understand the relationship it has with the first (column)
        Thank you so much for your availability.

        Reply
  6. x Michela

    Maybe it's the spacing between words that misled you: it's not column headers but it's a title: Corpo akasico (permanent).

    Reply

Leave a comment