Is it useful to know who you have been in previous lives?

D - You once said, as far as people who had known each other already in a previous life were concerned, that the highest part of us somehow remembers these past experiences (the rest is confused, ed).

Apart from the fact that I don't remember saying something like that, and this is serious: it means that I am also getting old.io! What can I have said?
Could I have said that when there was a bond with people in previous lives, what is this bond due to?
It is due to experiences shared with these people; now you know that all kinds of extensive experience, in fact, it can be traced back to a type of vibration, a type of vibration that goes up along the individuality until it is transcribed in the consciousness, in the Akasic body, contributing to an understanding. 

This vibration, which identifies the understanding of this experience, is a characteristic that remains typical of the individual - typical just as a vibration - and since the experience was lived together with another person, this type of vibration also vibrates in some way. in the other person, therefore there is a vibratory connection between people which, alone, is enough to make the other person recognize, even when perhaps he has taken on another body and there is another incarnation, this bond that exists was. How many times do you feel attracted or rejected by a person you may meet for the first time, without having any reason! This often happens to you all. 

This happens precisely for this reason vibration affinity so - evidently - there was an experience lived in previous lives, lived in common, positive or negative, because it is not said that only the positive one has taught something, and this vibration resonates within you and also in the other person who lived it.

Now if the experience was positive, useful, if it has borne fruit well for both people, this will be there vibratory attraction rationally inexplicable by each of you; if instead the experience will have been lived in a negative way here is that vibration will be discordantsimilar but discordant, there will be this sense of annoyance or reluctance to connect with the other person. I've been clear?

D – So I ask a question now too. I had communication in the Cerchio Firenze 77 in a sensational way with a very significant contribution from my previous life and here, precisely at the Cerchio Ifior, that reality was confirmed to me, and it was also confirmed to me elsewhere.
But I, no matter how much I have read and thought about who I am and what I would have been in my previous life, I can't find any affinity under any point of view. I have also read the related books, but absolutely nothing has emerged, while instead I was once told that something I cannot find should be there. Is it always mysterious or can I hope to know something someday?

My dear, there is certainly something! Let's say it is difficult to make a connection; even knowing that you have been another person in a previous life it is difficult to find truly common points in behavior, because the way the individual presents himself when he incarnates is due to his evolutionary needs, therefore his personality it is related to the needs of that moment, which are different from those for which he had previously incarnated.
However, there may be a certain thread of logic, especially as regards certain things that were not understood at the time and which, evidently, have not yet been understood now and these are the points in which it may be possible to recognize oneself. 

The difficulty is that, given the different times, mentality, customs and so on, it is not very easy to make a parallel between a personality of that time and one of now.
If, for example, I were to draw a parallel between your previous personality and your current one, it would be enough to think of dissatisfaction, for example. This continuous dissatisfaction and anxiety that you had then and that you still have now, because then as now you feel incomplete, incomplete, dissatisfied and you wish you had done more than what you have done up to now.

D - Yes. I have been repeated that I will be able to finish the program that I have to carry out and I am satisfied.

But think what a drama for you if, at the moment you finish the program, you realize that it was not really "what" you wanted! It means that, in reality, you are not really sure that that is your real interest in the end and, on the other hand, you know - according to the teaching - that it cannot really be that.
The real interest can only be to understand and arrive at the truth, not to divulge. (A .: Ah well, definitely.) So, without a doubt, every one of you who sets such a precise program, in the end you always find a pinch of disappointment.

Q - Can it be useful in this life to know - just to understand the purpose of our current life and then realize it - to know who we were in some past life?

But look, dear, I would say that - in my opinion - it is absolutely useless.
Let's try to think about a hypothesis for a moment: suppose you were - I know Cleopatra. Not so, I say it immediately, but suppose for a moment that you were Cleopatra, and about Cleopatra - all in all - we know enough about her life, even with all the novels and fantasies that have been created around her.

Now, what do you think you might need to know that you were that person when that person had different interests, different personalities, different social status, different motivations, different customs and so on?
You should be able to know what Cleopatra thought and what she felt inside, then you could draw a parallel between her feel and your feeling, but remember one thing: the things that Cleopatra did not understand then you may have understood them in the meantime and therefore it would be useless to know these things, and those that you did not understand and she had not yet understood are always your heritage, so they wouldn't help you anyway.

D - But certain experiences that from time to time are neglected because maybe in a lifetime you can understand some things and others not, maybe it takes other incarnations, maybe through the understanding of those past lives just seeing - I say, maybe I'm wrong - like a common thread that carries on from life to life.

But there is the problem, what you said; because it is not possible that you, like S., can now understand what your previous self had to understand!
You are two different I's, very different; therefore you cannot understand what Cleopatra could have understood, because all your lower bodies - the ones that are used to get the data, the perceptions to get to the understanding - are totally different.
It is only at the level of the Akasic body, perhaps, that this parallel can be drawn, but at the level of the lower bodies, no doubt not.

Readings for the interior: every day, a short spiritual reading of the Ifior Circle and of the Florence 77 Circle, on Whatsapp. 
(Read only, cannot comment) To subscribe

Q - Does this attraction or repulsion towards others always start from Akasic or is there also something that concerns - what do I know - aesthetics?

Ah well, I was talking about a borderline case referring to what we were saying, but there are many factors; even just simply social factors, of social mores, of social habits. How many times does a drug addict approach you to ask you something and you immediately go away feeling perhaps a sense of repulsion; this is not because in some previous life there was a negative shared experience, but simply because you may have internalized the negative image that society gives to that type of person.

So it is not very easy to say - beyond the concrete and precise example - when it is about something dating back to a previous life and when it is a social, psychological or inner motivation of the individual's moment. 
Sometimes there are people who, from one moment to the next, seem very nice or very unpleasant and this is clearly due not to the person himself, but to how your interiority moves at certain times, to the needs you have and that that person maybe satisfies or does not satisfy.

Q - There are many who are keen to find someone to tell them who they have been in a previous life. I have been told, it has been repeated - as I said before - I know who I should have been (I always use the conditional because I'm always cautious) but I don't care about knowing. How come it has been said and repeated to me, who does not care, and to others, who do so much to know, is kept silent?

Because you, my dear, did not expect to have been a great character, to have been a great one teacher, of having been - I don't know - one of the apostles, and so on, while all these people go in search of a previous life almost always because they hope to derive prestige and gratification from this discovery; so much so that, most of the time, they have always been great characters (strange case!)!

D - But what I was was a farmer, but he was a very smart person, who made history.

There have also been characters who have made history, so someone will have been that given character who has made history, but all men have made history, in reality; it is not the fact that one has been written in a book, or has done something apparently socially important, that can put him above the others!

D - I even think he was more evolved than me!

No, I really think this is not possible! With this, not that you have a very big one evolution, but in the sense that undoubtedly - if it is true that in the passage from one incarnation to another evolution increases - you can only be of greater evolution than that other individual. 

On the other hand you don't know, you see the actions that other individual has done but you don't know the reasons with which he made them; while you know that for evolution the intention with which what you do is done is important, and you - you can say what you want - in this life, despite certain selfish aspects, certain because of the fulfillment of your ego, there are many good intentions in what you do. 
Your previous self probably didn't have the same good intentions. 
Maybe, all in all, yes, he was doing something for the people, but in the meantime he was also careful to do a lot for himself.

Q - So evolution goes hand in hand with altruism, with altruistic intention?

With the altruistic intention, no doubt, yes.

D - I would like to bear a small testimony regarding the previous life. I was told - very recklessly, I think - that I was a killer, in a previous life. I would like to tell those who are looking for something from some previous life, to be very careful since I am carrying a sense of guilt which is one thing ...

Of course, certainly this is another big risk that is taken. The other big risk is that, if you think about all the responsibilities that you have in this life, and they are not few, if you were to add - and it could even be, if your state of consciousness is evolved enough - the knowledge of this that you have done in previous lives (we have always said it), you would no longer be able to live, at that point, oppressed by responsibility, knowing all the people you have killed, betrayed, robbed, mistreated, insulted, raped ... and whoever can most find adjectives, verbs, add more!

D - I would also like to say that, in reality, at the beginning of evolution we were all a little bit murderers, because this is precisely the beginning, right?

It can only be so; unfortunately, to learn not to kill you have to kill.

D - So there is absolutely no need to feel guilty about things that are now far from us, that is, far away even if they are part of our ...

Yes, certainly not needed; but, on the other hand, they are always reactions from one's inner self, so it is not as if one can say to that person: “Don't make yourself feel guilty”; if that person feels it as a sense of guilt undoubtedly there is still something to understand about it, and therefore something to move and carry on as understanding. Georgei

---