Karma and the child (k6)

Pdf format for printing, 4 pages
Babies move karma, and if they move it, how much karma can actually be heavy karma? I imagine that after all the various arguments, the conversations made with the other brothers in recent months, the question may already have a logical and consequent response from you to what has been explained.

D- Io I would say that even children move karma, because from what I understand, if karma is action, it is movement, it means that any living being moves karma, right? So from the mineral, to the vegetable, to the animal, to the human being, all living beings move karma. But what I can't figure out is to what extent, how heavy it is, as you rightly said…

So, obviously maybe you have a moment to clarify your ideas about it. In fact, I cannot let you go through without corrections what you said a little while ago, which is that minerals move karma. We have been saying lately that what moves karma is actually not the action, but the intention, right?
And we have also stated that when we speak of intention as the engine of karma, we are certainly not referring to the true intention, the intention of the Be, to the intention of the spark, but we refer to that intention that is moved under the thrusts of the Akasic body, agree?
Now, since an Akasic body does not exist in the mineral, clearly the mineral cannot move karma. The same, logically, is true for the vegetable and for most animals, at least until the animal reaches its last animal lives and therefore begins to already have a rudiment of akasic body, okay? [...]

ITrue karma only moves when there is a consciousness boost of some kind, and it is created by the fact that the consciousness is not yet well organized and therefore the impulses it sends to the embodied being are not precise, they are not fair, they are not refined enough to be able to push it any other way than selfishly.

But let us come to our child and his confrontation with karma.
Certainly the child's Akasic body will be more or less organized according to theevolution that the departing child will already possess.
However, this might suggest that the highly evolved child will never move karma since, having a high evolution, he will have an almost perfectly structured Akasic body, which will ensure that his intention will always be altruistic.

In reality this is not the case, and this too can be understood from another small aspect of the teaching that we have spoken about several times, namely that the various bodies of the individual gradually intertwine and it is not that the individual finds himself from birth with the various bodies already totally connected and interacting with each other. Thus, at birth, the child will have an akasic body, perhaps very well structured, very well organized, but the connections with this akasic body will not yet be perfect, but they will finish linking in the course of the following years, d 'agreement?

[…] But let's go back to our topic. We said that the child has only a more or less structured Akasic body that gradually merges with the other bodies to form what will eventually be the mature individual. Now, of course, until the connections are complete, the individual has imbalances in his actions; he has imbalances because the individual's equilibrium and maturity are given by the overall action of his bodies, the akasic body, the mental body, the astral body and the physical body; therefore, in the child since this balance does not yet exist, there will be moments of imbalance for which his actions, his way of being, even the intentions that he will then manifest on the physical plane will not have much value, after all, for his conscience .

THEintention starts from vibrations sent by the Akasic body, okay?
This intention vibrates within the mental matter looking for similar vibrations to guide it towards the physical plane.
When it finds them, it vibrates with the astral matter and even here it is favored in its manifestation by similar vibrations, within the astral plane and, in the end, it manifests itself within the physical plane.

Now, since in the child not all the mental body and the astral body, much less the akasic body, are connected, the intention, the vibration that starts from the akasic body will necessarily have to follow certain paths, will have few choices in its manifestation. , he may not find, for example, in his manifestation a mental vibration that helps him; what will this do? It will cause the vibration that starts from the Akasic body to take a different direction than it would normally take in an adult individual, and therefore it will somehow deflect and transform, even in a conspicuous way.

The same will happen when he does not find a similar vibration in the astral body, which means that many times the child's action will be totally different from what the Akasic body's thrust might have beenindeed to the point that there will have been no possibility, in reality, in the influence of the akasic body, of manifesting any intention, precisely because the raw material is lacking for the child to manifest it.

And since there is no such real possibility, the child's action will not be able to move karma in these cases, as karma truly becomes active when the manifesting intention can manifest itself in the right way, but it does not because stopped by internal factors of the individual.

We had said, some time ago, among other things, that the years of a child's life are very important. They are very important because they prepare the child, who will then be the adult individual, to face the karma that will be faced in the course of his existence.
In short, in the early years (and not only in the very first years, as part of psychology says, but until the individual is mature) the individual lays the foundations of his being to open the way, to open the vibrations within him. , to deal with the karma that comes from previous lives.

This explains the childhood traumas and fears that the child creates as a child and then finds himself having to face when he grows up: this is necessary for the individual in order to be structured in a certain way, to be able to already have within him the impulses, the movements, the doubts, the whys that could then lead him to understand when he is an adult, therefore in full awareness; or, at least, to ensure that when he can use his full awareness of him, if he so chooses, he will be able to deal with the karma that presents itself to him, and make a profit from it.

With all this talk I do not mean, however, that the child never moves karma.
In fact, there are cases in which it can move karma (and this is always a consequence of what I explained earlier): it happens when the intention that starts from the akasic body actually already finds the raw material with which to vibrate inside its body. mental, of his astral body.

We had said that the child's bodies are not yet fully intertwined, but they are only partially, which is increasing quantitatively with the passage of time. Now the karma that can move the child can only concern that part of the paths that are possible between his Akasic consciousness and the awareness of him.

It may happen, therefore, that an impulse towards an understanding reaches the child and that he has structured an inner path that can lead him to understand the small or large thing that is presented to him. The child's karma is generated precisely when he could understand something, yet he does not want to understand it; here, in these cases a karma can move, which certainly will never be a very big karma, as it is not yet completely structured, however it can already be an element, a basis of karma.

Of course, children's discourse is a very, very complex discourse, precisely because it constitutes the basis of the individual, it constitutes the ground on which the individual will then build himself and his own possibility of understanding.

Question - I was thinking if this speech you just made can also be valid for handicapped children, that is, for that type of handicapped who have a physical body that cannot respond to these impulses that come from other planes, all this always for what it's about karma.

I would say that the speech is still valid. It is still valid even in cases not only in which the child is handicapped but also the individual, in general, is unable to fully manifest himself on the physical plane.
And it is valid to exactly the same extent even if it fails to manifest itself, as (we repeat it and this is a concept that you must fully understand): it is not the manifestation that moves the karma, but it is the intention that moves it.

If the handicapped individual has his own well-structured Akasic body, he has his own mental body which, in reality, is well structured, he has his own astral body which is well structured, or at least in accordance with his evolution, here is the intention and therefore a chance to move karma.
Then, that the physical organs responsible for the manifestation of feelings or thoughts do not respond adequately within the physical plane, this absolutely does not mean that the individual with respect to his conscience does not accumulate karma.
Positive too, of course.

D - Earlier it was said that - from birth to full maturity - all these years serve to connect the various planes, the various bodies, and all this in turn serves to prepare the individual to dissolve his karma. So everything that psychology says: the influence of the environment, education, culture, social status, religion etc., this too only serves to provide the child with those stimuli to get to be ready to face that particular karma? Trauma including?

But without a doubt!
Everything that happens to the individual inserted in his own family, in his own environment, in his own society has the function of putting him in front of the experiences and situations he needs.
This always happens.

D - Yes, but we talked about karma that moves, not about karma that is undergone, can one suffer karma even at 10 years of age? Is a child who loses both parents at 7-8 years of age experiencing a karmic effect?

Here the discussion is to be made a little more subtle, perhaps. Let's say the action of karma undergoes it - in the case you just said - let's just assume at 10 years.
But, in reality, the real karma is then expressed, from maturity onwards, as it is from maturity onwards that he can understand the things that the previous action has put before him.

Let's say: experience comes first, the possibility of understanding comes later. So in reality karma, as it pushes towards understanding, the understanding that it cannot reach before, is a protracted karma that goes from the action undergone until the moment of understanding, or rather the possibility of understanding. [...]

It all seems difficult. It is difficult, as we have been repeating several times in recent times, to be able to put all the various pieces together. However, it seems to me that, if we keep in mind the last things we have said, the veil of intention of the Akasic body, of the passage of this intention through the will that sustains it until it manifests itself in the physical plane, then many things already have alone an explanation. It is enough to follow a simple logical process and try to understand this process of manifestation through the individual to understand a lot of things. Weather

---

Readings for the interior: every day, a short spiritual reading of the Ifior Circle and of the Florence 77 Circle, on Whatsapp. 
(Read only, cannot comment) To subscribe

Aphorisms of the Ifior Circle, on Wednesday on Facebook

Privacy policy of this site to consult before commenting, or subscribing to feeds.

---