D - It is a bit difficult, however, to make the leap from becoming to being. It is a dividing line that is quite incomprehensible to us, if we do not think in an unusual way.
Certainly, but if then we stop and tell you things that everyone is saying, it is useless even for us to come and talk, my dear. And if you don't want to make the effort to jump, you don't have to participate. You may even decide in your heart that what Scifo says is just nonsense! Very good! Will be for another time. Friends like before. Io I'm not offended.
Q - I wanted to ask you something about how to grow understanding.
I would go back a little, perhaps, to the Oedipus complex, just to stay on the subject. Do you still have something to ask?
D - The fact of genetics, which you mentioned ...
The fact of genetics at this point seems to me a false problem, in reality, as it is clear that within the genetic chain there is actually inscribed everything that the individual, when he incarnates, can potentially be (as our geneticist, first); that is to say there are all inclinations but there is no certainty that the individual will become that type of individual, both physically and psychologically (mainly psychologically, anyway).
How is it instead that the individual becomes "that type" of individual, that is, that certain genes begin to actively operate in that direction?
D - Influence of the environment?
D - Conditioning?
Q - In genetics we say "gene penetrance", but why?
And yes, why? Simply all genetic factors are in a certain way quiescent, at the start, and are then activated according to the needs of the individual.
If geneticists really managed to get to the bottom not only of the normal genetic chain but also the finer one, which still have not been able to understand that it exists (we had already mentioned once that there are two genetic chains, in reality) we would become I realize that within each genetic chain, in the end, there are all possibilities. There is not only a part of it. All the physiological and psychological possibilities of the individual are practically complete.
It is only that, under the impulses of the needs of individuality, the impulses that the akasic body sends, certain characteristics are activated or not.
Q - We all have the same genetic heritage but do we read it differently?
Yes, in a way I would say yes. Or rather: it is activated in a different way according to the individual's experience needs. Certainly this is an important role of the feel of the individual, why how is the genetic heritage activated?
It is activated through the vibrations of feeling, and therefore it is the same vibrations of feeling that excite certain parts of the genetic chain making them become active rather than quiescent, and therefore causing this manifestation of certain characteristics now psychological, now physiological and on and on and Street.
D - Scifo, but then also predispositions to certain diseases, by inheritance, are set in motion, or is it a karmic fact?
Well, you know, at this point distinguishing the karmic factor from all this discourse is a bit difficult because certainly the very fact that feeling has certain needs, certain needs for understanding, means that the individual has not understood something, and if he has not understood something means that he has moved (as we said in ancient times) a karma that he needs to understand. Therefore, if the vibrations of feeling that move the genetic chain to provoke certain reactions of the individual are moved by his non-understanding, it means that they are also moved by his karma.
Readings for the interior: every day, a short spiritual reading of the Ifior Circle and of the Florence 77 Circle, on Whatsapp.
(Read only, cannot comment) To subscribe
Q - So in the gene some stimuli are created immediately, so that the physical state in man develops… and others are created later, and others afterwards?
Certainly, without a doubt.
Q - Are mutations also conditioned in this way?
In large part, yes. Then, of course, there are also external influences, but the external influences are conditioned, then, by other factors that logically go beyond the feeling of the individual; but here perhaps we would broaden the discussion too much, it would become a little too specialized.
D - But then, do you not almost go back to saying that after all it is the Akasic body that "chooses"? Is it he who sends the vibrations and therefore determines (rather than chooses)?
The fact that you say "it is he who determines" implies that the Akasic body "knows" what it is doing, what it wants to do, but in reality the Akasic body - until it is fully constituted - is like a child he finds construction in the hands and tries to build a house according to what he thinks is the house but, since he has not yet laid the right foundation, here is that the house continues to collapse and, then, he will choose other pieces to try, and away and away and away until he realizes what the right pieces are, and then the house will be built.
D - Yes, but then it is he who moves his hands to build, to give impulses, etc.? If I have not misunderstood what you said, we would have everything in our DNA, that is, blondes, browns, browns, reds, etc. and, depending on these impulses, we will develop and be a blond or a brunette person, and that there are these Akasic vibrations depending on the needs, did you say?
No. The vibrations of feeling. It is slightly different.
Q - Is it different from feeling and Akasic?
They are not vibrations emitted by the Akasic body to change something; they are vibrations of acquired feeling from the akasic that affect the genetic matter. The speech is different.
Q - Are all the bases the same anyway?
Yes, let's say yes. Scifo
Privacy policy of this site to consult before commenting,
or subscribe to feeds.
Interesting, thanks.
The genetic heritage has all the possibilities in it.
The Akasic body does not determine the choices, but the Feeling that it has acquired.
Interesting.
Thank you.
These are the mechanics of each center of consciousness and expression, or how the intention is articulated from the higher and subtle planes to the denser one, which corresponds to the physical plane. Now, I begin to understand how fruitless it is to try to attribute freedom now to identity, now to conscience. One looks with a dual gaze and divides (identity and consciousness) something that should instead be contemplated as a whole, that is the center of consciousness and expression.
Thank you.
Really very interesting.
Thanks, interesting topic.
Any victimization temptation undermined
Many times the phrase "If you want to change your life, change it" has been read. At the end of reading this post, the words “Wanting is power” surfaced… no excuse in short!