How our way of loving is transformed

Q - Can we consider love as the highest form - at least within our reach - of communication, of the possibility of dialogue?

For one part yes, for one part no. That it is a high form of communication and dialogue certainly yes, also because it is the most difficult to implement and the most subtle as a way of expression and, to be true, it must be such that those who implement the communication of love he must not expect the other to respond to his own communication, but communicate, however and always, beyond the answer the other gives.

The "no" part, on the other hand, concerns the fact that you said that "we can put it into action", as very few of you are able to put into action a communication of love.

D - And this is related to ours feel current, and therefore to our capacity both vibratory and to perceive that liberating communication?

Certainly your inability to communicate your love to others is due to your needs, which prevent you from being truly full of love towards others; however, the communication of love is not liberating, it cannot be liberating. The communication of love, when it becomes a liberating communication, means that it is an interested communication.

To be a true communication of love - as I said before - it must be a communication made without expecting anything in return, neither response of love, nor liberation, nor affection, nor anything.
The person who truly loves, loves the other person regardless of how the other person acts, does, feels, thinks about him.

And this is what is difficult to accept also because of the parameters that you usually attribute to the word "love": you mean a relationship of love between two people when both people love each other, when they exchange, hug, they make cuddles, and so on, but this is not necessarily the case.

Love communication can be done by both people though it exists beyond the other person. If you truly love with true love, at that point there is no longer a communication of love between two people, but there is a communication of love towards the outside, whichever person comes under the ray of this love that feels inside. 'internal; it can no longer be addressed.
When love is directed, forced towards a person, it means that, however it may be, it still has some strongly selfish aspects.

D - So love is always and in any case a vibratory capacity of ours to which we should strive.

But you know, dear, everything - in reality - is a vibratory capacity of the individual; from selfishness to higher feeling, everything is a question of vibration; and as for the "tending" it is not that one can want to tend towards that situation: one arrives at that situation through understanding, it is a spontaneous, natural thing, which one arrives at, whether one wants or not, at a certain point.

It is an interior, intimate situation of the individual, which he arrives at through the understanding that, almost in a "mechanical" sense - although not in that cold way as it may seem with this word - a condition of interior love is established. which is capable of pouring outwards, therefore of creating this communication towards others.

Io I said: communicate love towards others without receiving a response from other people; however, invariably, there is a response to a communication of real love, often not a response of the same type as perhaps the other person has not achieved the same type of love, but also a rejection, for example, becomes a response. because it means that the other has perceived, has heard something; and the time will come when his feeling will have a slightly different nuance so that that moment will return to awareness, and maybe it will teach him that something that had prevented him from responding with the same love to the person who loved him at that moment.

• Readings for the interior: every day a short spiritual reading of the Cerchio Ifior and the Cerchio Firenze 77, up Whatsapp and Telegram.
• Summary of the philosophical teaching of the Ifior Circle: HOW CONSCIOUSNESS CREATES PERSONAL REALITY, you can order here the book. If you're reading this and want support, write.

D - In this regard it seems to collect however "in exchangeSomething positive, or in any case an answer to what has been given.

But this without a doubt. You see, let's go back to the speech that this evening seems to be the main speech of the discussion: the positive and the negative. To say positive and negative is only to ask a question of terms, nothing else; because something that seems negative in a moment then, perhaps, can turn out to be positive.

It is only revealing how one approaches the situation and, no doubt, the exchange always takes place between people, no doubt; if you are embodied together with other people, it is because with them you need to experience, and this means transmitting something to each other; then make, in some way, an exchange; which then, in the end, if you go and see, it is a hidden beginning of that feeling of love we were talking about earlier.

D - You were talking about this love that is reached gradually as you acquire understandings, so it also means, I think, that you overcome the ego; then it is a discourse of evolutionary levels: we will know how to love in that way only when the ego is completely overcome. Is the discourse like this?

Certainly the truest and highest sentiment of love will come when there are no more selfish impulses on the part of the ego, this undoubtedly; this does not mean that however, even when you are towards the last human incarnations, in which you will have a much smaller ego than what, for example, you have in the course of this life, you will already be able to have feelings of love and relationships of love. love.

Q - So could a level of love of a certain quality be the same, even if it is directed towards "some" people? Because otherwise it seems that we will pass from selfish love to love for everyone, all in one fell swoop; instead, since everything proceeds step by step ...

It will proceed step by step. Not only that, but there will also be a very delicate phase in which you, perhaps, will have already reached this ability to truly love other people but, due to the limitation of the constitution of your bodies at that moment, you will not be able, you will not be able to express it yet. .

It is a bit like the speech we did some time ago in which we said: "You are all more evolved than what you manifest in the course of life, since you keep in mind that the mental, astral and physical bodies you possess are built for the experiences of this life. ; therefore they are built with more matter of one type instead of another, and this limits your way of being within the physical plane, with the aim of making you find yourself in the best way, most useful for yourself, in the face of the experiences you have to do ».

But this fact of being limited by these types of particular bodies, created especially for your moment, means that certain understandings that you have already reached do not find the channels to come to the surface in the course of life.

This same discourse applies to love: you may have already reached a very sincere, very pure, very high type of love, but at this moment in your physical life, at that moment of your evolutionary path, you have lower bodies structured in a way. such as not to be able to find the preferential path to be able to manifest (on the physical plane, in your physical body, through your way of acting) this feeling of love that you possess.

And this is an encouraging note because it means - I repeat again - that you, in reality, how to feel, how evolution, you are better than you seem by observing how you are now, immersed in the physical plane.

D - I have had the feeling many times that I have witnessed wonderful gestures of love without the person he loved realizing ...

Most likely these were truly gestures of love because, I repeat, the gesture of love does not expect anything in return; therefore, at that point, the person does something in such a spontaneous and heartfelt way that he does not even realize it, it is something he does because he feels it is right to do it, full stop. Georgei

---