Do you have anything else to dispute? I'm talking seriously! All in all, to hear you refute something that io he seems to have said we are pleased, also because it is part of the discourse that (who knows why!) in the last meetings we have presented more than once.
We don't want to be taken as Bibles, but we want to be heard, introjected and then discussed according to what seems right or wrong to you, and not accepting everything we say at face value.
Do you remember that we have also said this lately? What you tend not to do, usually: you often tend to say: "Ah, if he said it or the other certainly is true", without taking into account that in these seventeen and more years of teaching we, more than once , we followed a particular technique, that is to say something wrong on purpose to ensure that all of you remain at attention for a moment and are ready to verify what you have understood or that you have not understood.
Perhaps there is still someone who will remember a famous session on Astrology, carried on throughout the evening, in which the present here Scifo said, one after another, enormous nonsense that was accepted quietly only because I said it myself. , then revealing the mystery, clearly, at the end of the session.
This too is a teaching method, one of the tools we sometimes use, because it is not always "roses and flowers" to follow what we say and do. Sometimes we even plan a few long-term blows to straighten a moment… I don't mean the backs, but the path of all of you who are struggling here, in our presence. Are you sure there is nothing else to dispute? Eh, after putting this flea in your ear, who is it that has the courage to speak !?
So, your ignorant Scifo - if I am not mistaken, and I do not think - in the last meeting, speaking of genetics (which was the topic that we were most concerned with, compared to everything you have discussed tonight, actually) has attributed the genetics to a certain Mendeleev and, with all the culture of those present, no one has pointed out the thing, no one has emphasized the thing even just to say: "Scifo, you are a great ignoramus".
What does this mean? It can mean many things: it can mean that you have fallen into inattention while I was speaking; it may mean that perhaps those who took it over, for love, to make things more beautiful and avoid any criticism of us, preferred to ignore it.
There are those who thought: “But maybe Scifo begins, after 17 years, to be a bit tired and then he gets a bit confused”, and on and on and on and on.
Instead, none of this; Scifo had said it on purpose in the hope that he would be detected, hoping for once to receive your criticism instead of having to be the one to criticize you. Alas, it didn't happen.
It happened instead that there was a criticism - and this is already something - on a misinterpreted phrase: the discourse of the 80-100 illusory incarnations. The meaning of my answer was simply that the individuality, the individual, making his experiences, making his life, deludes himself into being able to live 80 or 100 lives, or better: he thinks that with a certain behavior, striving to understand , accelerate your own evolution.
In reality it is an illusion because this cannot be: the number of lives that an individual lives is that and it can only be that, no one can finish earlier, no one can finish later, but it ends perfectly in sync with what are its needs, its drives that motivate and condition all its evolution. Do you understand, my dearest and tormented girl?
D - So what about sitting down?
Sitting down… what?
D - That is, if everything is already there, I'm sitting there ...
But do you really think you can sit still?
D - Of course not.
You can say: "I'm sitting there", but then you have to see if you can sit.
D - Listen, but then this constant your saying "know yourself" that has always tormented me, what is it for?
But it serves, dear, to carry out your incarnations. You "must" take that journey, you "must" get to know yourselves because you "must" get to accomplish - I know: as someone said - 93 lives. You have to live those 93 lives, we said, and to live them you have to know yourself. We simply remind you that you need to know yourself.
D - But one makes a crazy effort to know oneself and fails, in quotation marks ... it's very difficult ...
This is not true.
D -… and ultimately for what? Anyway, the 93 lives I have to live are written, and I will live them anyway.
But there is a way and way to live them internally. You continue to make confusion, error of projection, of perspective, in observing your physical life with how you live it internally. The speech is different.
The lives you are living, even if you understand, will continue to be as you live them * .
But the way you live them internally is what changes!
So you can live a life of suffering, illness and so on with serenity, or you can live it with pain, with breathlessness, with sadness, with despair..
You will live your life on the physical plane in the same way, but internally it will be lived very differently and this is what we and you want: to live your life internally in the best way because it is your inner part that suffers, it is not the part. physics.
Q - I mean, practically, do you mean that we face this life that we have to live in a better way, so we will have less suffering?
Of course.
D - The fact remains that your path is that, full stop.
Undoubtedly, it can only be so; otherwise it would be a random game of balls, dice; one pulls and what happens happens. And if it is impossible to think that it can happen for a lifetime, it cannot be possible to think that it will happen for all the lives of all embodied people. It would be a terrible confusion.
Q - So I can improve the quality of the way I experience situations?
Certainly.
Q - That is, is there that famous relative free will?
No doubt.
Q - But this will not make sure that I have some experiences and others not? I mean, when last time I asked you if the fact of being ...
Let's say that if by experience you mean the events of life I know: leave a guy, for example - if by experience you mean this, certainly the guy will leave him anyway. * ; what you can change is the fact that you may more or less suffer from leaving the boy.
D - But then, sorry, what is it that determines suffering in experience and what instead, in other situations, in other moments, the same experience is lived perhaps with serenity? There are maybe situations that have caused us a very very intense pain; what is it that must change in the face of situations that may still occur in life, similar situations?
But the difference in the way to live an experience, and to suffer it or not, depends on whether you understood what the experience had to teach you.
The moment you understand, the same experience - which can come back to you - will no longer make you suffer. It will be less difficult for you to deal with it, it will be easier to accept it and, therefore, move beyond the experience, move on to the next experience.
So it is your inner condition that makes the experience you are having suffer or not.
D - Only the inner one?
Only the inner one. You think of all the people who have a very serious illness and know it, yet they manage to smile and live the last days of their life smiling: how is this possible? Only because they have understood something interior that manages to make them accept that experience with serenity, while others despair and perhaps commit suicide.
Readings for the interior: every day, a short spiritual reading of the Ifior Circle and of the Florence 77 Circle, on Whatsapp.
(Read only, cannot comment) To subscribe
Q - Is it also related to death? That is to accept ...
It is also related to the death, however much there may be in all people, when the time approaches, the fear of the unknown; because, as far as you know, in reality it is always the unknown that you are going to face. There is always the possibility, however, of living it more or less serenely and this always depends on an internal condition, never on something external.
[...] Among the various disputes that could exist in what I said last time, which was all in the order of the contestable, there was the question of genetics, which - I repeat - you have overlooked and instead you should not have overlooked, because from genetics we will then return to the unconscious and from the unconscious we will arrive at Jung and we will continue our beautiful speech that we had started.
And, since you have overlooked it - in addition to telling you the other objection that was possible - I will give you a punishment task: since you have all proved so ignorant on the subject, it will be good for some of you to do a little research, in simple terms, understandable to all, because we try to speak in a way that everyone understands - right, L.? - and therefore without using big words; a kind of, as you can say, a primer of genetics, so that when we talk about something all of us - since this too was complained tonight - we use the same terms, the same way of speaking.
D - Excuse me Scifo, will the research have to be done on the basis of what you have said, or on books, encyclopedias, etc.?
Then, in the end, it is enough to talk a little bit about ... Mendeleev and the slightly more modern theories. Don't worry about the very modern ones because they are saying what I am saying, and therefore they are copying me.
D - Not to give an excuse, but I couldn't get an audible tape (from the last teaching session); I went crazy and therefore, not knowing anything because honestly I am ignorant, a lot, not knowing anything about Mendel, I will have missed this name and, even if I had heard it, I did not even understand what it was. That's why I'm asking you what to look for.
Of course, but the criticism, in fact, was aimed more than anything else at those who "could" have perceived the thing and who did not perceive it, and it would be right for them to understand why they did not perceive it, because they preferred to pretend not to perceive it.
Also because, if by chance this thing had been written in the Bulletin, it would have gone into the hand, outside, to people who perhaps read only that file, they would have read that scifo blunder and of course they would have branded the entire Circle as a thing to be to put aside.
Therefore, when we tell you to be careful, to criticize, it is also because you have the responsibility to ensure that things are understood well because they then go to the outside; and if you do not ask the right questions we cannot give the right answers, and if the questions are too long or incomprehensible, the reader does not understand, and on and on and on, because you are not only responsible for yourself but also for how it ends up that we, through the pages that are published, introduce ourselves to others. Right?
Eh, you didn't expect this today! On the other hand, I repeat, it was planned, also because it is for this reason that an extra teaching session was set up.
This too is teaching (you know that we also teach by example, not just with words) and we were sorry to take away a real teaching session for a “Zen” teaching of this type! Scifo
Privacy policy of this site to consult before commenting,
or subscribe to feeds.
It is the inner condition that makes the experience one is having painful, says Scifo, but learning to disconnect helps not to be at the mercy of it.
Doubt drives research. Never settle down. If a design also exists, but we should agree on what is meant by design, knowing yourself allows you to live in becoming with a lower rate of suffering and perhaps gives you the opportunity to become an instrument for the evolution of others.
We have a responsibility towards ourselves, but I believe, also towards others, since I have understood that the other is not separate from me.
Never give up on exercising your intellectual faculty; always exercise doubt.
Never validate anything that has not passed through our personal experience.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Aware of constituting the Immutable, of being part of the Great Design, nothing can be changed by the little human.
The only thing possible is to change one's perception of the Real: but that's all!
We have the opportunity to live the experiences more or less serenely,
it always depends on the inner condition.