D - I therefore understand that a discussion of responsibility towards others becomes very important; that is, while as regards the medium from a certain point of view these responsibilities could also be reduced, since the instrument - as you said - is an empty reed, it seems instead that for the psychic, being the result of his ability, this should lead to a greater sense of responsibility.
This greater sense of responsibility seems to me to be surrounded, in some way, by very particular moral qualities on the part of the psychic; that is, I cannot imagine a psychic who is a person ... I know ... extremely selfish, who thinks only of himself, but I imagine him as a person of marked sensitivity, a person capable of listening to others. Or am I wrong? (Robert)
Corn look, io I would quite agree with what you have said up to this point, but there is something I totally disagree with: the discourse of responsibility, eg.
It is not at all true that there is more responsibility for the psychic and, theoretically, less responsibility for the medium; in reality the responsibilities exist in both cases because there is also the moment after the phenomenon; and it is at that moment that the responsibilities of the medium perhaps become greater, more important than those of the psychic.
Why the psychic, perhaps the moment is over, finished getting paid for his service - as happens most of the time, either in money, either in kind, or in gratification - then the person, the "customer" with whom he is in contact, very often he will never meet him again, so his responsibility remains only his own thing, no longer towards others, after the experience.
- Readings for the interior: every day a short spiritual reading of the Cerchio Ifior and the Cerchio Firenze 77, up Whatsapp and Telegram.
- Summary of the philosophical teaching of the Ifior Circle: HOW CONSCIOUSNESS CREATES PERSONAL REALITY, you can order here the book. If you're reading this and want support, write.
While instead, for what concerns the medium, its responsibility is continuous, because it is certainly an empty reed through which the vibration of these entities passes evolution more or less large to manifest itself to living beings, but he himself then becomes… how can we say… an example observed by others, and therefore his behavior, his way of being can be reflected on what happens through him.
So if he is not honest, if he is not humble, if he is not sincere, if he is not available, if he does not prove in some way a suitable tool for letting those higher vibrations pass, then the damage [that it can cause] is even more extended of what the psychic can do with one, two or three people.
You know the words of an eventual Teacher [conveyed by that medium] then they do not stop at the group the Master is addressing, but they go where they are expected, that is, to all the people who are looking for the way; therefore they have an influence that spreads a little at a time like wildfire around the environment near these words, right?
The psychic who gets paid
Our friend A. sometimes says: «I understand the psychic who, in order to live, gets paid; maybe not a lot but in part he gets paid because, after all, even the psychic has to live ».
«So, we say, get paid because you talk, get paid because you eat, get paid because you observe, get paid because you listen, get paid because you live. What's different? ».
After all, the psychic uses senses like the others, which each of you possesses, and you cannot make other people pay for setting your skills in motion.
The moment you observe a psychic who gets paid, bien, at that moment you can be sure that his abilities, even if he possessed them from the start, are muffled, dampened by the fact that he gets paid, because getting paid means not realizing the gift that you have, that that gift does not really belong to him but was given to him to be at the service of others, and then a contrary vibration arises that disrupts the gift and makes it difficult to set the mechanisms in motion that make the gift act.
The medium who takes advantage
Of course the same goes for what concerns the medium: in order for entities with a certain type of vibration to come and speak, they need to find people with that type of vibration, otherwise as we have always said from the beginning the vibrations ... that I know ... of a Jesus Christ in any of you who acted as an intermediary would cause such a disturbance that you would get out of your mind, certainly; so there needs to be some resonance between the vibrations of the medium and the vibrations of the participating entities.
And rest assured, again, that when a medium starts using the words of the "voices" or what the voices do or say through him, to obtain personal effects - even if only aimed at becoming a prima woman and becoming someone who gets benefits, gratifications from the intervention of the Guides - from that moment on the Guides would not intervene anymore.
This is perhaps one of the big differences between sensitivity and mediumship. The psychic, despite his behavior, may have moments in which certain particular vibrations will still allow him to implement his gifts; but the medium, in the moment in which he behaves in a way inadequate to what may come through him, at that moment will create a field of vibrations such that the entities that usually present themselves will no longer present themselves.
You will say: "Corn then, if we look at the past, the history of mediumship, there were some mediums that there was really to be happy, because they combined really all the colors! ».
Bien, I tell you: «Most of those people, if not almost all, were not really mediums but they were psychics». You will say that there have been cases in which proven mediums, through which important entities came, and so on, out of the blue they began to look more at their interests than to keep a spiritual life in keeping with what was happening to them, yet the sessions continued and these great spirits continued to to come.
Bien, I tell you, this is not true; you "believe" that they kept coming, but in reality they were dramatizations, even when they were falsifications on the part of the medium as his unconscious had partly absorbed what came as eloquence, as personality by the entities that presented themselves and proposed it again in his own way.
You would realize then, looking over time, the words that are said, that become repetitive, without any more impetus, without anything new, without a teaching taking new courses, new directives, new knowledge; looking at the contradictions that so often meet, at a certain point, in these cases. Margeri
