The moment you belong to a transitory archetype and have experienced almost everything about it, through this experimentation you will have come to understand what you needed to understand, but almost completely, because you have not yet completely abandoned the archetype.
Now you find yourself in a situation in which you have experienced what the archetype has allowed you to experience, you have known it, you have understood it and therefore it is possible for you to realize the rightness and errors that this experimentation has brought about with sé.
At that point you find yourself in the situation of being able to guide others to understand, to finish their experimentation perhaps without going through the same painful mistakes as you may have done. Obviously, this entails problems, mainly of two kinds.
One is the reaction of the group, who, having not yet gone through the same type of experiences, cannot easily accept that the other individual has understood something that he has not understood, and therefore there may be a reaction of distancing or exclusion of the person from the group.
The other problem is instead in the individual's reaction who feels the weight of responsibility: if there are no other collateral understandings that push him towards sharing his own understanding with others, he tends to distance himself from the group so as not to burden himself, so as not to take on his shoulders the responsibility that his greater knowledge , which his greater understanding brings him as a gift.
“But – you will say – what function does all this have”? Simple, it has the function of helping the individual to abandon the archetype; through this double push, through this double mechanism, the individual who has experienced the archetype to which he adhered will lose the push of the evolutionary need and will end up moving away from the group and connecting to another type of archetype.
- Readings for the interior: every day a short spiritual reading of the Cerchio Ifior and the Cerchio Firenze 77, up Whatsapp and Telegram.
- Summary of the philosophical teaching of the Ifior Circle: HOW CONSCIOUSNESS CREATES PERSONAL REALITY, you can order here the book. If you're reading this and want support, write.
[…] So, when we talk about a transitory archetype, the constitution or adherence to a transitory archetype, we consider the fact that an environment is created – that's why we talked about the environment last time – where they come from evolutionary episodes of a group of people are enacted, and this involves implementing all its components, otherwise it would not be an implementation of evolutionary needs but rather something extremely fragmentary and, as such, of little use.
I mean that both the physical body, the astral body and the mental body of the individual who is connected to it react to the transitory archetype, and that the archetype has the scope given by the atmosphere created by the various bodies of the individuals belonging to that archetype.
Now a situation - as we said before - of rejection or distancing, obviously applies to all the individual's bodies, has repercussions on all the individual's bodies; therefore, if it physically manifests itself through distancing from the physical group, from the social group, let's suppose, as far as the mental body is concerned the distancing occurs through the abandonment of certain thought patterns to follow others.
D – So even the kids at school: there are those who are marginalized, but it doesn't mean that they are marginalized for who knows what reason, they could also be marginalized for this reason, they can be rejected by the group because perhaps unconsciously they have to find the way to overcome the archetype?
There could be multiple explanations in this case. It could be a similar situation, but it could also be that in reality that boy who lives in a situation of not belonging to the social group within the physical plane, in reality is only minimally connected to that archetype as an interest evolutionary and therefore finds himself disoriented by having contact with people who have behavioral models, archetypal models different from those he would need.
Take the example of A., a typical teenager: it is clear that the models that the other kids follow with whom he tries in some way to have contact are not the models that he needs, that interest him in a particular way.
This because? Because, evidently, he doesn't need to experience that type of experience; this means that he, inevitably, by force of circumstances, cannot be anything other than an individual who joins that group because he needs to relate, but is not truly part of it, something that others perceive and to which to some extent they react.
The result is that the group does not truly welcome him into its fold but tends to marginalize him and, at the same time, the boy lives in the group but does not truly share its archetype, therefore he will feel profound discomfort and little incentive to try to fit in more.
Q – How useful can it be for an individual to necessarily have to interact with archetypes in which he then does not recognize himself. In the sense that an archetype provides you with behavioral dictates but if an individual does not hear them he finds himself an alien.
It has a function, a very important, truly important utility, because it tells the individual what he or she is really interested in and what not: if the individual can pay attention to what his reactions are towards people belonging to another archetype, he can understand what his needs really are.
Q – So it is routed towards its path, through a different path than that of similarity?
Of course, on the other hand, opposites coincide in the end, you know. Saying yes or no many times ends up being the same thing, and in this case the issue is the same: having an experience through direct experience or through its rejection always ends up being a way to interact in any case with experience (yes or no still lead you, in the end, to the experience you need, ed.).
You see, the beauty of the drawing that was created is precisely this: that is, the fact that every element that is present in the drawing cannot be examined in itself, taken and dissected, extracted from context, because it is perfectly embedded in the drawing, and every its element is functional so that all the rest of the drawing can be painted, otherwise it would disintegrate.
This is the extreme beauty of the creation of the Absolute, but it also brings extreme difficulty in being able to understand it, as it is complicated to be able to take into account all the elements that should be kept in mind in order to truly understand what Reality is.
Unfortunately, the lower bodies of individuals, as you know, have major limitations: there are those who have the brain, the terminal of the mental body so to speak, that is more lively, those who have it slower, those who are more gifted for reasoning mathematician, who is more suited to abstract reasoning and all this always turns out to be a fractionation of the perception of the drawing.
This means that, in reality, as much as we can come to talk to you, to tell you, to explain, you will never really be able to perceive either through our words or through your reasoning that some connection, or a part of what is reality.
This does not mean that Reality cannot be perceived in its entirety: Reality will be perceived in its entirety through the feel and it will be something else entirely.
The purpose of this enormous and complicated drawing, of this enormous and complicated plot, is precisely to allow you to increasingly increase your sense of the akashic body, or rather your feeling and, therefore, to arrive, little by little, at broadening this feel and perceive all the greatness of the drawing until you recognize yourself in the drawing itself.
This is the only true way that it is possible for each of you, as part of the Whole, to perceive the Whole. I wouldn't want you to be demoralized by this or to think that all the years spent hearing us talk, listening to Scifo's ramblings, were years wasted, because that's not the case; in reality, if you are here it is because you needed to hear these speeches and because, through this archetype that we have all created together, you can experience a small portion of the understanding of the big picture, and then from this, little by little, expand it to arrive at an understanding of the Whole. Scifo
Clear topic, thanks to Scifo and the editor.
thank you